COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PREVALENCE OF HAEMOPROTOZOAN DISEASES IN CATTLE

R.K. DAMOR1, S. MORWAL2*, S.K. SHARMA3
1Pashu Vigyan Kendra, Dungarpur, 314036, Rajasthan, India
2Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary & Animal Science, Navania, 313601, Udaipur, Rajasthan University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Bikaner, 334001, Rajasthan, India
3Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary & Animal Science, Navania, 313601, Udaipur, Rajasthan University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Bikaner, 334001, Rajasthan, India
* Corresponding Author : sandhyamorwal@gmail.com

Received : 22-07-2023     Accepted : 28-08-2023     Published : 30-08-2023
Volume : 15     Issue : 8       Pages : 12540 - 12542
Int J Agr Sci 15.8 (2023):12540-12542

Keywords : Prevalence, Cattle, Theileriosis, Babesiosis and Trypanosomiasis
Academic Editor : P. Kaur, Kamini Bisht, Yogesh Ashok Garde, Anindita Paul
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary & Animal Science, Navania, 313601, Udaipur, Rajasthan University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Bikaner, 334001, Rajasthan, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : DAMOR, R.K., et al "COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PREVALENCE OF HAEMOPROTOZOAN DISEASES IN CATTLE." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 15.8 (2023):12540-12542.

Cite - APA : DAMOR, R.K., MORWAL, S., SHARMA, S.K. (2023). COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PREVALENCE OF HAEMOPROTOZOAN DISEASES IN CATTLE. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 15 (8), 12540-12542.

Cite - Chicago : DAMOR, R.K., S. MORWAL, and S.K. SHARMA. "COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PREVALENCE OF HAEMOPROTOZOAN DISEASES IN CATTLE." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 15, no. 8 (2023):12540-12542.

Copyright : © 2023, R.K. DAMOR, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Objective- To study the comparative prevalence of haemoprotozoan disease (Theileriosis, Babesiosis and Trypanosomiasis) in cattle in Udaipur district of Rajasthan. Materials and Methods- A total of 195 cattle was screened in this study during April 2022 to November 2022 out of which 50 animals were diagnosed with haemoprotozoan infection. The most common haemoprotozoan infections diagnosed in the study area were theileriosis, babesiosis and trypanosomiasis. All these diseases were diagnosed on the bases of history of affected cattle, clinical signs and blood smear examination. Prevalence was recorded on the basis of age, sex, breed and season. Results- Cattle are most affected bovine animal by haemoprotozoan infection and the highest prevalence of theileriosis and babesiosis was found in the group above the age of 3 years i.e., .20 % and 7.77%, respectively and in case of trypanosomiasis it was group between 6 months to 2 years. Sex wise prevalence was higher in females affected by theileriosis and babesiosis than in male. In research area descript cattle (56.41%) have more haemo-protozoan infection than non-descript (43.58%) cattle. Higher prevalence was observed during the rainy season in theileriosis (16.84%) and trypanosomiasis (5.26%) and in case of Babesiosis it was summer season (12.72%)

References

1. Mahmud M.A.A., Belal S.M.Sh. and Hossain M.A. (2015) Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries, 2(1), 79-86.
2. Sitotaw T., Regassa F., Zeru F. and Kahsay A.G. (2014) Journal of Parasitological and Vector Biology, 6(2), 16-22.
3. Snedecor G.W. and Cochran W.G. (1989) Statistical methods, 8th Edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 54, 71-82.
4. Ananda K. J. and Adeppa J. (2016) Journal of Parasitic Diseases, 40(3), 890-892.
5. Muraleedharan K. (2015) Veterinary Research International, (3), 81-8.
6. Haque Md.A., Hasan Md M., Hossain Md. E., Islam Md. R. (2022) Asian journal of medical and biological research, 8(1), 1-8.
7. Kumar V., Ramprabhu R., Mohanapriya T. and Gopal K. (2018) Intas Polivet, 19(2), 228-230.
8. Biyazen H., Duguma R. and Asaye M. (2014) Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 12, 1-6.
9. Khan N., Tippu Y., Rana M.Ys., Akhtar H.R., Sajid S.A. and Hussein W. (2011) International Workshop on Dairy Science Park, Peshawar, Pakistan, 29.
10. Glass E.J., Craigmile S.C., Springbett A., Preston P.M., Kirvar E., Wilkie G.M., Eckersall P.D., Hall F.R. and Brown C.G.D. (2003) International Journal for Parasitology, 33, 1409-1418.
11. Rather S.A., Tak H. and Kakru D.K. (2015) Agricultural Advances, 4(11), 122-128.
12. Krishnappa T., Muralidhara A., Sastry K. N. V., Renukaprasad C. and Krishnappa G. (2002a) The Indian Veterinary Journal, 79, 183-184.
13. Parmar D. and Chandra D. (2019) Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 7(3), 167-170.
14. Krishnappa T. (1999) PhD Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore.
15. Kamani J., Sannusi A., Egwn O.K. and Dogo A.G. (2010) Veterinary World, 3(9), 445.
16. Nair A.S., Ravindran R., Lakshmanan B., Kumar S.S., Tresamol P.V., Saseendranath M. R. and Ghosh S. (2011) Tropical Biomedicine, 28(1), 68-75.
17. Radostits O.M., Gay C.C., Hinchcliff K.W. and Constable P.D. (2007) Veterinary medicine: A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats, 10th ed., Elsevier, Philadelphia.