VISHWANATH1*, S. KUMAR2, P.C. YADAV3, L. SINGH4, Y. PANDAY5, R.K. PATEL6
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur, 208002, Uttar Pradesh, India
2Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur, 208002, Uttar Pradesh, India
3Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur, 208002, Uttar Pradesh, India
4Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur, 208002, Uttar Pradesh, India
5Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur, 208002, Uttar Pradesh, India
6Bundelkhand University, Jhansi, 284128, Uttar Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : vishwa8159@gmail.com
Received : 05-11-2022 Accepted : 27-11-2022 Published : 30-11-2022
Volume : 14 Issue : 11 Pages : 11883 - 11885
Int J Agr Sci 14.11 (2022):11883-11885
Keywords : F1s, F2s generation, Variability
Academic Editor : Dr R. S. Umakanth, Rohlupuii, Dr J. R. Talaviya
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur, 208002, Uttar Pradesh, India; Bundelkhand University, Jhansi, 284128, Uttar Pradesh, India and UGC-Rajiv Gandhi National Fellowship (RGNF) for research
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
Analysis of variance were found out for all sixteen characters viz. days to 50% tasseling, days to 50% silking, physiological maturity, plant height (cm), cob length (cm), cob diameter (cm), kernel rows per cob, kernels per row, 100 seed weight (g), germination (%), seedling length (cm.), seed vigour index, harvest index (%), biological yield, grain yield per plant and shelling (%). Highly significant differences were observed among the treatment for all sixteen characters. The treatment variance was further partitioned into its components viz. parents, F1s, F2s, parents vs F1s and parents vs F2s highly significant differences were observed among them except seedling length and seed vigour index in parents vs F2s. It’s indicated that more variability observed base material of different traits as well as all possible combination of generated materials
1. Zaffar G., Zargar G.H.and Wani A.S. (2001) Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 61(2), 111-114.
2. Jebaraj S., Selvakumar A. and Shanthi P. (2010) Indian J. Agric. Res.,44(2), 136-140.
3. Jha S.K., Singh N.K., Kumar A.R., Agrawal P.K., Bhatt J.C., Guleria S.K., Lone A.A., Sudan R.S., Singh K.P. and Mahajan V. (2013) Indian J. Genet., 73(1), 29-35.
4. Jones D.F. (1917) Genetics, 2, 466-479.
5. Kage U.K., Wali M.C., Deepa M., Natikar P. and Gangashetty P. (2013) Molecular Plant Breeding, 4 (18), 146-149.
6. Kanagarasu S., Nallathambi G., Kannan S. and Ganesan K.N. (2013) Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 4(4), 1319-1324.
7. Kumar P.G., Prashanth Y., Reddy S.N., Kumar S.S. and Rao P.V. (2014) International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience,2(1), 106-111.
8. Kumari J, Gadag R.N., Jha G.K. and Joshi H.C. (2009) Research on Crops, 10(2), 323-332
9. Mahdi Z., Rajab C., Eslam M.H. and Mohammad R.B. (2011) African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(3), 693-703.
10. Mahesh N., Wali M.C., Gowda M.V.C., Motagi B.N. and Uppinal N.F. (2013) Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 26(2), 185-189.
11. Maruthi R.T. and Rani K.J. (2015) Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 7(1), 149-154.
12. Menkir A. and Ayodele M. (2005) Crop Science, 45, 163-170.
13. Nadagoud, V.K., Jagadeesha R.C., Wali, M.C., Kachapur, R.M. (2012) Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 25(1), 124-126.
14. Nayak V.H., Singh R. and Potla K.R. (2013) Environment and Ecology, 31(4), 1669-1671.
15. Netaji S.V.S.R.K., Satyanarayana E. and Suneetha V. (2000) The Andhra Agri. J., 47(3/4), 201-205
16. Sasidharan N., Chakraborty S., Patel J.N., Trivedi R., Panwar B.S. and Vala A. (2012) International Journal of Plant Sciences, 7(2), 341-350.
17. Sharma R., Maloo S.R. and Joshi A. (2014) Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 5(3), 545-551.