M.P.M. DEEPA1*, P.S. SRIKANTHA MURTHY2
1Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, 560065, Karnataka, India
2Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, 560065, Karnataka, India
* Corresponding Author : deepapalb7004@gmail.com
Received : 01-12-2020 Accepted : 26-12-2020 Published : 30-12-2020
Volume : 12 Issue : 24 Pages : 10471 - 10474
Int J Agr Sci 12.24 (2020):10471-10474
Keywords : Water user categories, Cropping pattern, Crop diversification, Irrigation intensity, Gross cropped area (GCA), Net cropped area (NCA)
Academic Editor : Dr Basavaraj Patil, Medini Ibrahim, Dr Vipul N Kapadia
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, 560065, Karnataka, India. Authors are also thankful to Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) for financial support for research
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
Cropping pattern, crop diversity and irrigation intensity of four water user categories i.e. own users (FUO), water sharing farmers (FShU), water selling farmers (FSeU) and water purchasing farmers (FPU) were analyzed in Chitradurga and Tumkuru districts of Karnataka. Institution of groundwater sharing and groundwater markets help farmers in making wise decisions regarding types and number of crops to be cultivated in a year and volume of groundwater to be applied. Modified entropy index (MEI) was used to analyze the crop diversification. Results have shown that, crop diversification is more in FShU farmers (0.92) as they allotted major proportion of land area (51.84 %) under field crops and was lowest in FPU farmers (0.82) as they have cultivated perennial crops in a larger area (62.57 %). Irrigation intensity was highest in FUO farmers’ category (88.44 %) and was lowest in FPU farmers category (70.83 %). Sharing of groundwater among siblings helped them to use available groundwater effectively and motivated them to incorporate diversity in their cropping system. FUO farmers were reluctant to take up more crops as they opined that, excessive crop diversification poses difficulties in management. FSeU farmers had less MEI value as preferred to save groundwater as they were also involved in groundwater selling
1. Kiran K.R.P. (2015) PhD Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, 560065, Karnataka, India
2. Srivastava S.K., Ranjit Kumar and Singh R.P. (2009) Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 22, 87-97.
3. Basavaraj N.D., Gajanana T.M. and Satishkumar M. (2016) Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 29 (1), 151-158.
4. Deshmukh M.S. and Shinde V.T. (2016) North Asian Int. Res. J. of Social Science & Humanities, 3 (2), 20-32.
5. Dinesh K.N. (2016) Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 29 (1), 93-104.
6. Biswas R.K. (2016) Int. J. Bio-resource Sci., 3 (1), 25-30.
7. Todkari G.U. (2012) Int. J. Agric. Sci., 4 (1), 165-167.