EFFECT OF SEED PRIMING ON SHOOT AND ROOT LENGTH IN MARIGOLD SEEDS

K. SINDHU1*, S.K. SEHRAWAT2
1Department of Horticulture, Floriculture and Landscape Architecture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004, Haryana, India
2Department of Horticulture, Floriculture and Landscape Architecture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004, Haryana, India
* Corresponding Author : sindhuhorti846@gmail.com

Received : 03-09-2019     Accepted : 26-09-2019     Published : 30-09-2019
Volume : 11     Issue : 18       Pages : 9082 - 9085
Int J Agr Sci 11.18 (2019):9082-9085

Keywords : Marigold, Seed, Priming, Shoot length, Root length
Academic Editor : Dr Aruna G.R., Dr Tanweer Ahmed
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Horticulture, Floriculture and Landscape Architecture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004, Haryana, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : SINDHU, K. and SEHRAWAT, S.K. "EFFECT OF SEED PRIMING ON SHOOT AND ROOT LENGTH IN MARIGOLD SEEDS." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11.18 (2019):9082-9085.

Cite - APA : SINDHU, K., SEHRAWAT, S.K. (2019). EFFECT OF SEED PRIMING ON SHOOT AND ROOT LENGTH IN MARIGOLD SEEDS. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 11 (18), 9082-9085.

Cite - Chicago : SINDHU, K. and S.K., SEHRAWAT. "EFFECT OF SEED PRIMING ON SHOOT AND ROOT LENGTH IN MARIGOLD SEEDS." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11, no. 18 (2019):9082-9085.

Copyright : © 2019, K. SINDHU and S.K. SEHRAWAT, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Marigold is one of the important annual flowers grown for commercial purpose all over the world. Non availability of high-quality seeds of marigold is one of the major constraints in its cultivation. Priming of Marigold seeds plays crucial role in its germination, shoot length and root length. Hence a laboratory study was carried out to investigate the influence of various priming treatments on shoot and root length of French marigold seeds. This study was carried out on marigold seeds of four lines and nine treatments. Seeds treated with 0.5% KNO3 exhibited significantly higher shoot length (10.950cm) during 0 month storage. In 2, 4, 6, 8- and 10-months storage duration, significantly maximum shoot length was observed in T4 (9.217cm, 7.225 cm, 6.500 cm, 4.758 cm and 3.458 cm) respectively. Maximum shoot length was recorded in G-4(9.36cm) which was followed by G-1 (8.40 cm) and G-3 (7.85cm) during 0-month storage. In 2, 4, 6, 8- and 10-months storage duration, significantly maximum shoot length was observed in G-4 (8.03cm, 6.763cm, 5.752cm, 4.785cm and 2.956cm) respectively. Seeds treated with 0.5% KNO3 exhibited significantly higher root length (4.625cm) over the other treatments during 0-month storage. In 2, 4, 6, 8- and 10-months storage duration, significantly maximum root length was observed in T4 (4.175cm, 3.908 cm, 3.275 cm, 2.158 cm and 0.983 cm) respectively. Maximum root length was recorded in G-4(4.877cm) which was followed by G-1 (4.709 cm) and G-3 (4.350 cm) during 0-month storage. In 2, 4, 6, 8- and 10-months storage duration, significantly maximum root length was observed in G-4 (3.933 cm, 3.315 cm, 2.644cm, 1.959 cm and 0.937 cm) respectively.

References

1. Rao C.C., Dadlani N.K. and Dadlani M. (2003) Seed Science and Technology, 32(2), 503-509.
2. Nawaz A., Amjad M., Pervez M.A. and Afzal I. (2011) African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(15), 3551-3559.
3. Ghassemi-Golezani K., Aliloo A.A., Valizadeh M. and Moghaddam M. (2008) Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 6(2), 222.
4. Karimi M. and Varyani M. (2016) Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 61(3), 215-226.
5. Abdollahi Farzin and Jafari (2012) International J. Agriculture, Research and Review, 2(5), 573-579.
6. Afzal I., Ashraf S., Qasim M., Basra S.M.A. and Shahid M. (2009) Seed Science and Technology, 37(2), 436-445.
7. Jegathambal R. and Shanmugam K. (2007) Madras Agricultural Journal, 94(7/12), 189-191.
8. Junhaeng P., Thobunluepop P., Chanprasert W. and Nakasathien S. (2016) Journal of Developments in Sustainable Agriculture, 10(2), 115-120.
9. Lee S.S. and Kim J.H. (2000) Korean Journal of Crop Science, 44(2), 108-111.
10. Selvarani K., Umarani R. and Sivasubramaniam K. (2011) Madras Agricultural Journal, 98(4/6), 124-128.
11. Siadat S.A., Moosavi A. and Sharafizadeh M. (2012) Research Journal of Seed Science, 5(2), 51-62.
12. Singh G.G.S.S. and Kamaljith Kaur (2001) Seed Research 29(2), 235-237.
13. Yan M. (2015) South African Journal of Botany, 99, 88-92.