M.V. SRINIVASA REDDY1*, IMRANKHAN JIRAGAL2, M. PAPIREDDY3, P. VENKATRAMANA4
1College of Sericulture, Chintamani, 563125, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore, 560 065, Karnataka, India
2College of Sericulture, Chintamani, 563125, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore, 560 065, Karnataka, India
3College of Sericulture, Chintamani, 563125, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore, 560 065, Karnataka, India
4College of Sericulture, Chintamani, 563125, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore, 560 065, Karnataka, India
* Corresponding Author : mvsreddy43@gmail.com
Received : 30-07-2019 Accepted : 27-08-2019 Published : 30-08-2019
Volume : 11 Issue : 16 Pages : 8929 - 8931
Int J Agr Sci 11.16 (2019):8929-8931
Keywords : Sericulture, Tree type mulberry and improved practices
Academic Editor : Saikia Monimala
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to College of Sericulture, Chintamani, 563125, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore, 560 065, Karnataka, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
Sericulture is one of the promising enterprises supporting agriculture. It is a labour intensive, employment creating and income generating agro based industry providing gainful employment to 8.51 million mostly rural people. The present study was conducted in Siddlagahatta and Srinivasapur taluks of Chikkaballapur and Kolar districts of Karnataka during 2017-18. It is reported that, 51 percent of sericulture farmers possessed medium overall adoption followed by 32 percent had high adoption and 17 percent had low overall adoption level of improved sericulture practices. Ten independent variables fitted in Multiple regression and indicated that 61. 30 percent of the variation in the adoption of sericulture practices.
1. Beula Priyadarshni M. and Vijaya Kumari N. (2013) International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 3(2), 43-46
2. Sagar Mondal (2017) Fundamentals of Agricultural Extension education Kaiyani Publishers, Delhi.
3. Sakthivel N., Kumaresan P., Qadri M.H., Ravikuma J. and Balakrishna R. (2012) Biopest, 212-215.
4. Sreenivasa B.T. and Hiriyanna (2014) Global Journal of Biology, Agriculture& Health Sciences, 3(1), 239-243.
5. Srinivasa Reddy M.V., et.al.(2019-2020) Int J Arch. App. Sci. Technol., 11(1), 125-130
6. Todmal S.B., Khalache P.G., Gaikwad J.H. and Jadhav R.M. (2013) Advance Research Journal of Social Science, 1, 112-114.
7. Vijaya Kumari K.M. and Rajan R.K. (2015) Agric.Sci. Digest., 35(3), 203-206.