IN VITRO EVALUATION OF DIETS OF BUFFALOES CONTAINING DRIED DISTILLERS GRAINS WITH SOLUBLES AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SOYBEAN MEAL

R.N. CHANDRIKA1, JASMINE KAUR2*, J.S. LAMBA3, J.S. HUNDAL4, R.S. GREWAL5
1Department of Animal Nutrition, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004, India
2Department of Animal Nutrition, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004, India
3Department of Animal Nutrition, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004, India
4Department of Animal Nutrition, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004, India
5Department of Animal Nutrition, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004, India
* Corresponding Author : sachdeva_jasmine@rediffmail.com

Received : 08-03-2019     Accepted : 25-03-2019     Published : 30-03-2019
Volume : 11     Issue : 6       Pages : 8074 - 8077
Int J Agr Sci 11.6 (2019):8074-8077

Keywords : Dried distillers grains with solubles, In vitro digestibility, TMR
Academic Editor : Manjula Thakur
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Animal Nutrition, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, 141004, India
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : CHANDRIKA, R.N., et al "IN VITRO EVALUATION OF DIETS OF BUFFALOES CONTAINING DRIED DISTILLERS GRAINS WITH SOLUBLES AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SOYBEAN MEAL." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11.6 (2019):8074-8077.

Cite - APA : CHANDRIKA, R.N., KAUR, JASMINE, LAMBA, J.S., HUNDAL, J.S., GREWAL, R.S. (2019). IN VITRO EVALUATION OF DIETS OF BUFFALOES CONTAINING DRIED DISTILLERS GRAINS WITH SOLUBLES AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SOYBEAN MEAL. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 11 (6), 8074-8077.

Cite - Chicago : CHANDRIKA, R.N., JASMINE KAUR, J.S. LAMBA, J.S. HUNDAL, and R.S. GREWAL. "IN VITRO EVALUATION OF DIETS OF BUFFALOES CONTAINING DRIED DISTILLERS GRAINS WITH SOLUBLES AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SOYBEAN MEAL." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11, no. 6 (2019):8074-8077.

Copyright : © 2019, R.N. CHANDRIKA, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

In vitro studies were carried out to investigate the effect of using dried distillers grains with solubles (cereal milling by-product) as a substitute for soybean meal (SBM) in the diet of buffaloes. SBM comprising 6% of the whole diet (total mixed ration; TMR) was substituted by rice dried distillers’ grains with solubles (RDDGS) at five levels (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100%) on N basis. In vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD), organic matter disappearance (IVOMD), net gas production (NGP), methane production and fermentation efficiency of TMRs was studied. RDDGS substitution at 25, 50 and 75% significantly increased (P<0.05) IVOMD and IVDMD. The NH3-N decreased (P<0.05) with the increasing level of RDDGS in the TMRs. The relative proportion (%) of acetate declined (P<0.05) and that of propionate increased (P<0.05) with the increasing level of RDDGS in the TMRs and subsequently the A: P ratio declined (P<0.05) with RDDGS inclusion beyond 25% level replacing SBM in the TMR. No significant effect of RDDGS inclusion was observed on methane production. The fermentation efficiency increased (P<0.05) with the increasing level of RDDGS in TMRs. In conclusion, RDDGS could replace up to 75% of the soybean meal in the TMR of buffaloes which is equivalent to 4.5% of the whole dietary DM.

References

1. National Livestock census. (2012) In: 19th Livestock census. All India report. Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Krishi Bhawan, NewDelhi.
2. AOAC (2000) Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists,Washington DC, USA.
3. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson J.B. and Lewis B.A. (1991) J. Dairy Sci, (74), 3583-3597.
4. Licitra G., Hernandez T.M. and Van Soest P.J. (1996) Anim. Feed Sci. Tech, (57), 347-358.
5. Menke K.H., Raab L., Salewski A., Steingass H., Fritz D. and Scheinder W. (1979) J. Agric. Sci, (92), 217-222
6. Menke K.H. and Steingass H. (1988) Anim. Res. Dev, (28), 7-55.
7. Pecka Kielb, E., Zawadzki W., Zachwieja A., Michel O., Mazur M. and Mista D. (2015) Pol J. Vet Sci, (18), 751-58.
8. Yogi R.K., Thakur S.S., Madhu Mohini, Singh S.K. and Tariq Malik. (2017) Indian J. Anim. Nutr, 34 (2), 163-168.
9. Blummel M., Makkar H.P.S and Becke K. (1997) J. Anim. Physio Anim. Nutr, (77), 24-34.
10. Geron J.V., Garcia J., Martins Coelho K.S., Sílvia Cristina de guiar, Moura Zanine, A., de Souza, A.L., Carvalho, J.T.H., Roberto, L.S. , Neto, E.L.S. and Ferreira, D.J. (2017) Ciências Agrárias, (38), 2029-40.
11. Reed J.J., Lardy G.P., Bauer M.L., Gibson M. and Caton J.S. (2006) J. Anim. Sci, (84), 2200–12.
12. Walter L.J., McAllister T.A., Yang W.Z., Beauchemin K.A., He M. and McKinnon J.J. (2012) J. Anim. Sci, (90), 1291-1300.
13. Mista D., Pecka E., Zachwieja A., Zawadzki W., Bodarski R., Paczynska K., Tumanowicz J., Kupczynski R. and Adamski M. (2014) Folia Biologica (Kraków), (62), 345-51.
14. Orskov E.R. (1975) World Rev Nutr Diet, (22), 153-82.