COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MUGA COCOON YIELD IN IMPROVED AND TRADITIONAL PRACTICE

D. MECH1*, S.C. DAS2, M. AHMED3
1School of Biological Science, University of Science & Technology, Ribhoi, Baridua, 793101, Meghalaya, India
2School of Biological Science, University of Science & Technology, Ribhoi, Baridua, 793101, Meghalaya, India
3School of Biological Science, University of Science & Technology, Ribhoi, Baridua, 793101, Meghalaya, India
* Corresponding Author : dmechcsb@gmail.com

Received : 02-02-2019     Accepted : 12-02-2019     Published : 15-02-2019
Volume : 11     Issue : 3       Pages : 7818 - 7820
Int J Agr Sci 11.3 (2019):7818-7820

Keywords : Muga culture, Traditional practice, Improved technology
Academic Editor : Vijay N
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to School of Biological Science, University of Science & Technology, Ribhoi, Baridua, 793101, Meghalaya
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : MECH, D., et al "COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MUGA COCOON YIELD IN IMPROVED AND TRADITIONAL PRACTICE." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11.3 (2019):7818-7820.

Cite - APA : MECH, D., DAS, S.C., AHMED, M. (2019). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MUGA COCOON YIELD IN IMPROVED AND TRADITIONAL PRACTICE. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 11 (3), 7818-7820.

Cite - Chicago : MECH, D., S.C. DAS, and M. AHMED. "COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MUGA COCOON YIELD IN IMPROVED AND TRADITIONAL PRACTICE." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11, no. 3 (2019):7818-7820.

Copyright : © 2019, D. MECH, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The study was undertaken to assess the muga cocoon yield through adoption of improved and traditional practice separately in seed and commercial crops at the farmers’ level. The study revealed that average cocoon yield in both seed and commercial crops was higher in improved practice against the traditional practice of muga culture. In improved practices, average number of cocoon yield was found 47 and 42 per dfl against the cocoon yield of 31 and 20 per laying in traditional practice during Chatua (Feb-Mar) and Bhadia (Aug-Sep) seed crops 2014 respectively. Similarly, the average number of cocoon yield in both Chatua and Bhadia seed crops during 2015 was higher in improved practice (45 & 24) against the traditional practice (37 & 19) respectively. Likewise, average number of cocoon yield per dfl in Jethua (Apr-May) and Kotia (Oct-Nov) commercial crops during 2014 was higher in improved practice (62 & 58) against the cocoon yield per laying in traditional practice (49 & 43) respectively. Similarly, the average number of cocoon yield per dfl in both Jethua and Kotia commercial crops was higher in improved practice (65 & 52) against the cocoon yield per laying in traditional practice (47 & 43) respectively during 2015. The t-test conducted for equality of variance in ERR between traditional and improved practices found highly significant at 1 and 5 percent level in all the seed and commercial crops in both the years. Thus, the study revealed that improved practice was effective for higher cocoon yield against traditional practice of muga culture.

References

1. Barah A., Mech D., Singh K.C. and Suryanarayana N. (2004) Journal of Assam Science Society, 45(1), 19-28.
2. Barah A., Mech D., Hazarika U. and Chakravorty R. (2006) Sericologia, 46(4), 423-431.
3. Barah A. and Mech D. (2011) Bulletin of Life Sciences, Vol. XVII, 34-42.
4. Choudhury B., Ahmed S.A. and Chutia M. (2016) Farmers friendly technologies in muga and eri silk sector for sustainable productivity improvement- present and future. In Proceedings National seminar on problems & prospects of muga and eri silk sectors organized by CMER&TI, 25th-26th February 2016.pp 1-11.
5. Das K. and Das R. (2012) ‘Lahdoi’ a novel approach for controlling muscardine disease in muga silkworm, Antheraeaassmensis Helfer (Lepidoptera , Saturniidae), National Seminar on Recent trends in Research & Development in Muga Culture-ideas to action, Guwahati, 3-4th May 2012 pp 125-131.
6. Goswami D., Singh N.I., Ahamed M., Kumar R. and Giridhar K. (2015) Biological Forum-An International Journal 7(1),146-151.
7. Kakati B.T. (2009) Effect of technology dissemination on growth and production of muga silk industry in Assam- acase study in Lakhimpur district, Status papers & Abstracts, National Conference on Vanya Silk, 28th -30th January, CMER&TI, Lahdoigarh, Jorhat, p205.
8. Mech D., Barah A., Singh K.C. and Surynarayana N. (2004) Indian J. Seric, 43(1), 95-98.
9. Mech D., Sankar M. and Chakravorty R. (2008) Intervention of improved technologies in muga culture, Abstract Cum Souvenir, National Seminar on Environmental Issues in North East India, Past Present and Challenges ahead,10th -11th May,2008, Gargaon College, Simluguri Pp 145-151.
10. Mech D., Handique P.K. and Dhar N.J. (2011) Intervention of Improved Technologies in Muga and Eri Culture through Cluster Approach”, In, Proceeding of National conference on Sericulture Innovations Before and Beyond 2011. 28th& 29th January 2011 CSR&TI, CSB, Mysore, Pp 467-471.
11. Mech D., Kumar R., Singh N.I., Goswami D., Das R. and Giridhar K. (2015) Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 8(2), PP 1-8.
12. Phukan J.C.D., Pamehgum M, Neog K. and Chakravorty R. (2008) Organic manure based farming system for management of soil health and environment toward sustainable muga crop production in N.E. Region of India. Abstr. cum Souv., National Seminar on Environmental Issues in North East India, Past Present and Challenges ahead,10th -11th May,2008, Gargaon College, Simluguri p 87.
13. Singh N.I., Goswami D., Ahmed M. and Giridhar K. (2014) Journal of Applied Biology & Biotechnology, 2 (02),012-015.