YIELD GAP ANALYSIS IN KABULI CHICKPEA (CICER KABULI ANUM.) THROUGH FRONT LINE DEMONSTRATION

A.K. SHUKLA1*, D.K. MISHRA2, R. RAKESH JAIN3, N. PACHLANIYA4, K. SHUKLA5
1ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kasturba Gandhi National Memorial Trust, Kasturabagram, Indore, 452020, Madhya Pradesh, India
2ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kasturba Gandhi National Memorial Trust, Kasturabagram, Indore, 452020, Madhya Pradesh, India
3ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kasturba Gandhi National Memorial Trust, Kasturabagram, Indore, 452020, Madhya Pradesh, India
4ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kasturba Gandhi National Memorial Trust, Kasturabagram, Indore, 452020, Madhya Pradesh, India
5ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kasturba Gandhi National Memorial Trust, Kasturabagram, Indore, 452020, Madhya Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : arunpagarbhu@gmail.com

Received : 04-01-2019     Accepted : 24-01-2019     Published : 30-01-2019
Volume : 11     Issue : 2       Pages : 7770 - 7772
Int J Agr Sci 11.2 (2019):7770-7772

Keywords : Chickpea, Deep ploughing, Seed treatment
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kasturba Gandhi National Memorial Trust, Kasturabagram, Indore, 452020, Madhya Pradesh, India. Authors are very thankful to the farmers of adopted villages for providing their cooperation for conducting the experiments
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : SHUKLA, A.K., et al "YIELD GAP ANALYSIS IN KABULI CHICKPEA (CICER KABULI ANUM.) THROUGH FRONT LINE DEMONSTRATION." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11.2 (2019):7770-7772.

Cite - APA : SHUKLA, A.K., MISHRA, D.K., RAKESH JAIN, R., PACHLANIYA, N., SHUKLA, K. (2019). YIELD GAP ANALYSIS IN KABULI CHICKPEA (CICER KABULI ANUM.) THROUGH FRONT LINE DEMONSTRATION. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 11 (2), 7770-7772.

Cite - Chicago : SHUKLA, A.K., D.K. MISHRA, R. RAKESH JAIN, N. PACHLANIYA, and K. SHUKLA. "YIELD GAP ANALYSIS IN KABULI CHICKPEA (CICER KABULI ANUM.) THROUGH FRONT LINE DEMONSTRATION." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11, no. 2 (2019):7770-7772.

Copyright : © 2019, A.K. SHUKLA, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer kabuli anum.) is a major pulse crop grown in Madhya Pradesh particularly in Indore district with 11.83 q/ha which is far below than its potential yield (20 q/ha). Therefore to enhance its production and productivity front line demonstration were carried out at Indore district during 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18. The interventions imparted under front line demonstration were consisting Improve variety, {Phule G 0517 (Kripa)}, integrated nutrient management (20:60:20 kg N: P: K /ha + Rhizobium + P.S.B.@ 5 ml per kg of seed), integrated pest management, Deep ploughing, seed treatment with Trichoderma viridi, Quinolphos @1.5 lt/ha+ Indoxacarb 3.3 lt/ha). Existing farmers practice was treated as control. Full gap was observed in case of variety, seed rate, seed treatment, seed inoculation, while partial gap was observed in use of inorganic fertilizer and plant protection measure followed by the farmers. 26.23 percent average yield enhancement was recorded with extension gap ranging between 3.1, 2.4 and 3.49 q/ha during the period of study. The trends of technology gap (ranging between 5.4, 6.93 and 4.39 q/ha) reflected the farmer’s co-operation in carrying out such demonstration with encouraging results in sequent year. Average technological index 14.8 % showed the feasibility of the evolved technology at the farmer’s field. Net return under recommended practices was recorded Rs 70553, 73220 and Rs 57847 while it was Rs 45593, 57228 and Rs 39525 under existing farmers practice. Benefit: cost ratio was ranged between 1: 3.47, 3.25 and 1:2.97. Consequently it was clearly showed that the Front line demonstration can paved the way of minimizing the gap between actual yield of chick pea and its yield potential.

References

1. Tomar R.K.S., Sharma P. and Yadav L.N. (1999) Int. Chickpea Pigeonpea News Lelt. 6, 22-23.
2. Sharma O.P. (2003). Agric. Extn. Rev., 15(5),11-13.
3. Kirar B.S., Mahajan S.K. and Nashine R. (2004) Indian Res. J. Ext. Edu., 5(1),15-17.
4. Yadav D.B., Kamboj B.K. and Garg R.B. (2004) Haryan J. Agron, 20,33-35.
5. Krishna Kant, Kanaujia K.R. and Kanaujia S. (2007) Annual Plant Protection Sciences, 15, 303-306.
6. Mishra D.K., Paliwal D.K., Tailor R.S. and Alok Deswal (2009) Indian Res. J Extn, Edu., 9(3), 26-28.
7. Burman, Roy R., Singh A.K. and Singh A.K. (2010) Indian Res. J Extn, Edu., 10(1),99 -104.
8. Lathwal O.P. (2010) Annals of Agriculture Research. 31, 24-27.
9. Tomar R.K.S. (2010) Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources, 1,515-517.
10. Verma Deependra Praksh (2013) M.Sc. (Ag.)Thesis, Jawahar lal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur M.P.
11. Anonymous (2015-16) www.mpkrishi.net.in.
12. Anonymous (2017) Pulses in India, Restrospect & Prospect DES, Ministry of Agri. & FW (DAC&FW), Govt. of India.
13. Matharu K.S. and Tanwar P.S. (2018) Agric. Update, 13(1),62.66.
14. Shukla A.K., Pachlaniya Nitin, Mishra D.K. and Deswal Alok (2018) Agric. Update, 13(1,77-80)