A.P. BOWLEKAR1*, P.M. TILEKAR2, R.R. GAWALI3, A.B. GADHAVE4
1Dr Budhajirao Mulikh College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Mandki-Palvan, 415606, Dr Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Maharashtra 415712, India
2Dr Budhajirao Mulikh College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Mandki-Palvan, 415606, Dr Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Maharashtra 415712, India
3Dr Budhajirao Mulikh College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Mandki-Palvan, 415606, Dr Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Maharashtra 415712, India
4Dr Budhajirao Mulikh College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Mandki-Palvan, 415606, Dr Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Maharashtra 415712, India
* Corresponding Author : adwaitbowlekar1808@gmail.com
Received : 29-09-2018 Accepted : 12-10-2018 Published : 15-10-2018
Volume : 10 Issue : 19 Pages : 7278 - 7280
Int J Agr Sci 10.19 (2018):7278-7280
Keywords : Brackish water, filter, media, EC, pH, irrigation
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to Dr Budhajirao Mulikh College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Mandki-Palvan, 415606, Dr Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Maharashtra 415712, India
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed
The brackish water filter consisted of filtering media like sand, gravel, grit, charcoal, broken brick, gypsum, sponge and sawdust. The effective depths for sand, gravel, grit, charcoal, gypsum, broken bricks and sawdust were found to be 45 cm, 30 cm, 15 cm, 15 cm, 7.5 cm, 15 cm and 30 cm, respectively. It was observed that EC and pH of untreated brackish water was reduced after filtration. The EC of brackish water was 41.7 dS/m which was reduced to 35.9 dS/m with a per cent reduction of 13.90%; while pH was 7.89 which was further reduced to 7.23 with per cent reduction of 8.36%. The total cost of newly developed brackish water filter was found to be Rs. 623. Filtered brackish water was in permissible limits for irrigation after treatment. It was also predicted that this filter can also be used for filtration of sea water.
1. Ahmad G. E. and Schmid J. (2002) National Research Centre, Solar Energy Department.
2. Greenlee L. F., Lawler D. F., Freeman B., Marrot B. and Moulin P. (2009) Water Research, 43,2317–2348.
3. Oxenford J., Xu P., Ruetten J. and Choto Z. (2010) Water Research Foundation and Arsenic Water Technology Partnership, 2(4), 127-133
4. Kesieme U. K. and Duke M. (2013) Desalination, 323, 66-74.
5. McCool B. C., Rahardianto A., Faria J. I. and Cohen Y. (2013) Desalination, 317, 116–126
6. Ping Q., Huang Z., Dosoretz C. and He Z. (2015) Water Research, 77, 13-23.
7. Ang W. L., Mohammad A., Benamor A., Hilai N.and Leo C. (2016) Desalination. 7.
8. Khanzada N. K., Khan S. J. and Davies P. A. (2016) Desalination, 7.
9. Abdulbaki D., Hindi M., Yassine A. and Najm M. (2017) Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 994-1006.
10. Lienhard V., Karim M., Daniel M. and Nayar K. (2017) Desalination, 420, 167–182.
11. Lopez A. M., Williams M., Paiva M., Demydov D., Do T., Fairey J., Lin Y. and Hestekin J. (2017) Desalination, 409,108–114.
12. Pramanik B. K., Gao Y., Fan L., Roddick F. and Liu Z. (2017) Desalination, 404, 224–229.