C.V. VIRAJA1*, V.M. THUMAR2, NARENDRA SINGH3, P.M. THANKI4, V.B. TANDEL5
1Department of Agricultural Economics, N.M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat, India
2Planning Officer, Directorate of Research, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat, India
3Department of Agricultural Economics, ASPEE College of Horticulture and Forestry, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat, India
4Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture Bharuch, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat, India
5Department of Agricultural Economics, N.M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat, India
* Corresponding Author : patelchandrakant8180@gmail.com
Received : 24-07-2018 Accepted : 11-08-2018 Published : 15-08-2018
Volume : 10 Issue : 15 Pages : 6779 - 6780
Int J Agr Sci 10.15 (2018):6779-6780
Keywords : Chemical fertilizer, FYM
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to N.M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat for research funding
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed
The results indicated that the coefficient of multiple determinations (R2) is 0.90. The result of the study revealed that the rhizomes (0.32), tractor charge (0.19), human labour (0.80) chemical fertilizer (0.26) and FYM (0.19) were found positive and highly significant at 1 percent level. Human labour was found to be the most influential input on yield determination followed by rhizomes, chemical fertilizer, FYM and Tractor & machinery. However, the plant protection chemical (0.02) and irrigation (0.06) were found positive and non- significant. In MVPs it is concluded that, rhizomes, tractor charge, human labour, chemical fertilizer, irrigation and FYM have positive and statistically significant relationship which indicate that an increase in the application of these inputs would lead to increase in the output of turmeric. All the variables except plant protection chemicals were found to be underutilized.
1. Anjaneyulu N. (1983) M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad.
2. Anonymous (2017) Indian horticulture, Database -2016-17 online: www.nhb.gov.in
3. Anonymous (2017) Directorate of horticulture, Gandhinagr. (Government of Gujarat), 2016-17, http:/doh.Gujarat.gov.in
4. Naik V. R. (2013) Ph.D Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, Karnataka (India).
5. Karthick V., Alagumani T. and Amarnath J.S. (2013) Agricultural Economics Research Review, 26 (1), 109-114.