EFFECT OF PLANT GEOMETRY AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SESAME (Sesamum indicum L.) UNDER RAINFED VERTISOL

R. SUVITHA1*, M. JOSEPH2, M. HEMALATHA3, A. SENTHIL4, G. BHARATHI5
1Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College & Research Institute, Killikulam, Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, India
2Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College & Research Institute, Killikulam, Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, India
3Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College & Research Institute, Killikulam, Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, India
4Department of Crop Physiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, India
5Department of Crop Physiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, India
* Corresponding Author : suvitha59528@gmail.com

Received : 02-07-2018     Accepted : 11-07-2018     Published : 15-07-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 13       Pages : 6543 - 6546
Int J Agr Sci 10.13 (2018):6543-6546

Keywords : Plant spacing, Nutrition, Rainfed sesame
Academic Editor : Dr A L Narayanan
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to Agricultural College & Research Institute, Killikulam, Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, India
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : SUVITHA, R., et al "EFFECT OF PLANT GEOMETRY AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SESAME (Sesamum indicum L.) UNDER RAINFED VERTISOL." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10.13 (2018):6543-6546.

Cite - APA : SUVITHA, R., JOSEPH, M., HEMALATHA, M., SENTHIL, A., BHARATHI, G. (2018). EFFECT OF PLANT GEOMETRY AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SESAME (Sesamum indicum L.) UNDER RAINFED VERTISOL. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10 (13), 6543-6546.

Cite - Chicago : SUVITHA, R., M. JOSEPH, M. HEMALATHA, A. SENTHIL, and G. BHARATHI. "EFFECT OF PLANT GEOMETRY AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SESAME (Sesamum indicum L.) UNDER RAINFED VERTISOL." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10, no. 13 (2018):6543-6546.

Copyright : © 2018, R. SUVITHA, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted at black soil farm, Agricultural research station, Kovilpatti, Tamil Nadu. The sesamum variety SVPR 1 was sown during rabi season (October – January) to find out suitable plant geometry, levels of fertilizers and foliar spray of Mepiquat chloride at 30 DAS, MnSO4 and DAP at flower initiation and capsule formation stage for maximize the growth and yield. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design and three replications. The trial consists of twelve treatments in combination of plant spacing, nutrient levels and foliar nutrition. The Results revealed that, rainfed sesame sown with closer plant spacing of 30 × 20 cm coupled with 125 per cent RDF followed by foliar spray of 125 ppm Mepiquat chloride at 30 DAS + 0.5 % MnSO4 & 2 % DAP at FIS & CF significantly improved the components viz., plant height, dry matter production and crop growth rate. This attributes contributed in producing significantly higher seed (706 kg ha-1) and stalk yield (1799 kg ha-1) over recommended practice of 30 × 30 cm spacing + 100 % RDF alone.

References

1. Gupta S.K., Yadava T.P., Parkash K. and Thakral N.K., Kumar P. (1998) Annals of Biology, 14, 67-68.
2. Teshome T. (2016) Nature and Science, 14(12), 19-28.
3. Caliskan S., Arslan M., Arioglu H. and Isler N. (2004) Asian J. Plant Sci, 3(5), 610-613.
4. Vinod K., Ghosh B., Ravi B. and Karmakar S. (2000) Indian Journal of Agronomy, 45(4), 756-760.
5. Dippenar M.C., Nolte C.R. and Barnard C. (1990) S. Afr.J. Plant Soil, 7, 50-54.
6. Haruna I., Aliyu L., Olufajo O. and Odion E. (2011) American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research, 10, 561-568.
7. Noorka I. R., Hafiz S. and El-Bramawy M. (2011) Pak. J. Bot, 43(4), 1953-1958.
8. Paware K. (1991) University of Agricultural Sciences.
9. Dubey O. and Khan R. (1993) Indian Journal of Agronomy, 38(4), 582-587.
10. Bakhshandeh A. (2010) Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 8, 25-33.
11. Schilling R. and Cattan P. (1991) Oleagineux, 46(3), 125-128.
12. Shehu H., Kwari J. and Sandabe M. (2010) International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 12(6), 845-850.
13. Kanade V., Chavan S. & Kanvilkar S. (1992). Journal of Maharashtra Agriculture University, 17(1), 12-14.
14. Wang Z., Yin Y. & Sun X. (1995) Photosynthetica (Czech Republic).
15. Bhowmick M. (2006) Environment and Ecology, 24(4), 1028.
16. Kalpana R., Subbian P. & Selvi R. (2003) Tropical Agricultural Research,15,20-26.
17. Mahajan A., Bhagat R. and Gupta R. (2008) SAARC Journal of Agriculture, 6(2), 29-32.
18. Dixit P. M. and Elamathi S. (2007) Legume Res, 30(4), 305-307.
19. Shrivastava G. and Tripathi R. (1992) Indian J. Agron.,37, 602-604.
20. Vaghani J. (2010) Ph.D. Thesis, JAU, Junagadh.
21. Verma S., Saxena R. & Singh H. V. (2012) Bioinfolet-A Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences, 9(4), 576-579.