RAHUL BHARDWAJ1*, R.S. SAIN2, RAJDEEP MUNDIYARA3, ANKITA SHARMA4
1Division of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, 302 018, India
2Division of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, 302 018, India
3Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Sri Karan Narendra College of Agriculture, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, 303329, India
4Division of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, 302 018, India
* Corresponding Author : bhardwajrahul4u@gmail.com
Received : 20-04-2017 Accepted : 22-04-2017 Published : 12-05-2017
Volume : 9 Issue : 22 Pages : 4238 - 4241
Int J Agr Sci 9.22 (2017):4238-4241
Keywords : Wheat, Combining Ability, Half Diallel, GCA, SCA
Academic Editor : Dr L. D. Sharma
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : I express my esteemed appreciation to Department of Science and Technology (DST), India whose financial support made it possible for me to conduct without any hindrance
Author Contribution : My major advisor (R.S. Sain) played a pivotal role during the whole period of research by suggesting and planning the present investigation while my true colleagues Rajdeep Mundiyara and Ankita Sharma extended their unreserved help of varied nature at eve
To increase the production and productivity in wheat cultivation, new set of varieties having good combining ability are required. Because, the choice of the most suitable breeding method depends mainly on the combining ability behaviour vis-a-vis nature of gene action involved in the control of the trait of interest to the breeder. Therefore, the present research investigation was carried out with 10 parent half diallel set consisting of parents, F1’s and F2’s to estimate the general and specific combining ability variances and effect. An overall appraisal revealed that parent Raj 3777, Raj 4037, Raj 4120 and Raj 4083 were most desirable parents while among the crosses, the cross WH 1021 x Raj 3777 emerged as good specific cross combinations for grain yield and its contributing attributes as they showed significant and high gca and sca effects for most of the characters under study.
1. Vavilov N.I. (1926) Bull. Appl. Bot. Plant Breed., Leningrad (St. Petersburg), 16, 139-248.
2. Khan M.A., Ahmad N., Akbar M., Rehman A. and Iqbal M.M. (2007) Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 44 (1), 1-5.
3. Grifing B. (1956) Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 9(4), 463-493.
4. Sharma J.K. and Singh H.B. (1990) Himachal J. Agril. Res., 16(1/2), 48-55.
5. Joshi S.K., Sharma S.N., Singhania D.L. and Sain R.S. (2002) Wheat Info. Serv., 95, 5-10.
6. Joshi S.K., Sharma S.N., Singhania D.L. and Sain R.S. (2003a) Acta Agron. Hung., 51, 139-147.
7. Manmohan S., Sohu V.S. and Mavi G.S. (2003) Crop Sci., 30, 189-197.
8. Singh H., Sharma S.N. and Sain R.S. (2004) In: Proccedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress. Brisbane; Australia.
9. Ajmal S., Asif M. and Munir M. (2004) Quarterly Science Vision, 9(1-2 & 3-4), 1-5.
10. Gothwal D.K. (2006) Unpubl. Ph.D. Thesis, RAU, Bikaner, Campus- Jobner.
11. Singh J., Garg D.K. and Raje R.S. (2007) Indian J. Genet., 67, 193-195.
12. Akinci C. (2009) Bulgarian J. Agric. Sci., 15(3), 214-221.
13. Yao J.B., Ma H.X., Ren L.J., Zhang P.P., Yang X.M., Yao G.C., Zhang P. and Zhou M.P. (2011) AJCS, 5(11), 1408-1418.
14. Houshmand S. and Vanda M. (2008) Crop Sci., 10 (6), 629-635.
15. Pancholi S.R., Sharma S.N., Sharma Y. and Maloo S.R. (2012) Crop Res., 43 (1, 2 & 3), 131-141.
16. Adel M.M. and Ali E.A. (2013) Asian J. Crop Sci., 5(1), 14-23.
17. Joshi A.B. and Dhawan N.L. (1966) Indian J. of Genet., 26A, 101-113.
18. Dhariwal H.S. and Singh K.B. (1970) Theory and Applied Genetics., 40(1), 117-120.
19. Jensen N.F. (1970) Crop Sci., 10 (6), 629-635.
20. Joshi S.K., Sharma S.N., Singhania D.L. and Sain R.S. (2004) Hereditas, 141 (2), 115-121.
21. Hassan G., Mohammad F., Afridi S.S. and Khalil I. (2007) Sarhad J. Agric., 23 (4), 937-942.
22. Singh K., Singh U.B. and Sharma S.N. (2013) J. Wheat Res. 5 (1), 63-67.