D.K. PANCHESHWAR1*, S. MISHRA2, S. KUMAR3, G. SINGH4
1Department of Plant Breeding & Genetics, College of Agriculture, JNKVV Jabalpur, MP
2Department of Plant Breeding & Genetics, College of Agriculture, JNKVV Jabalpur, MP
3epartment of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, JNKVV Jabalpur, MP
4Department of Plant Breeding & Genetics, College of Agriculture, JNKVV Jabalpur, MP
* Corresponding Author : dinesh11pancheshwar@gmail.com
Received : 06-02-2016 Accepted : 10-04-2016 Published : 14-06-2016
Volume : 8 Issue : 20 Pages : 1362 - 1363
Int J Agr Sci 8.20 (2016):1362-1363
Keywords : Yellow Mosaic Virus, Highly Resistance, Genotypes and Soybean
Academic Editor : Gajanand Nagal, Baskaran R. K. Murali, Anil Kurmi, Brajesh Kumar Namdev, Arpit Suryawanshi, S. K. Yadav
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : None declared
Author Contribution : None declared
Yellow mosaic virus (YMV) is a major disease of soybean, which can cause up to 80 % yield loss in severe cases. Chemical or cultural control of YMV is neither economical nor environment-friendly. Deployment of genetic resistance is considered to be the effective way to control it. Therefore, present study was conducted to identify stable sources of resistance for YMV disease, A 72 soybean germplasm lines, collected from different parts of the India were screened for YMV disease reaction at YMV hotspot in 2014. No genotypes were exhibited absolute resistant reaction; however 40 genotypes viz., CAT 87, JS 98-79, JS 20-05, JS 20-24, JS 20-29, JS 20-74, JS 20-76, JS 20-82, JS 20-69, JS 20-90, JS 20-98, JS (IS) 90-5-12-1, PK 885, PK 1225, PS 1466, PS 1539, PS 1540, SPC 175, SL 96, SL 517, SL 710, SL 744, SL 799, SL 900, SL 955, UPSM 534, PK 515, PS 1225, PS 1584, GSDL 7, GSDL 49, GSDL 57, GSDL 82, PK 416, PS 564, PS 19, PS 1573, SL 958, SL 983 and PSB 13-15 exhibited highly resistance. Similarly, 16 genotypes viz., B 327 B1664 CAT 783 DS 2410 HIMSO 1681 JS 99-72 JS 20-21 JS 20-30 JS 20-73 JS 20-77 NRC 56 PK 768 PS 1518 RVS 2002-4 SL 738 and PSB 13-16 etc. were showed moderately resistant reaction. The rest genotypes showed moderately susceptible (02) susceptible (08) and highly susceptible (06) reactions