ISSN : 0975-3710
EISSN : 0975-9107
HARIKESH1*, AKHTAR ALI2, PRATIBHA SINGH3, R.N. KEWAT4
1Department of Agronomy, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, 224229, Uttar Pradesh, India
2Department of Agronomy, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, 224229, Uttar Pradesh, India
3Department of Agriculture Bio Chemistry, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, 224229, Uttar Pradesh, India
4Department of Agriculture Bio Chemistry, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, 224229, Uttar Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : vimileshkumaryadav@gmail.com
Received : 10-11-2023 Accepted : 28-12-2023 Published : 30-12-2023
Volume : 15 Issue : 12 Pages : 12809 - 12812
Int J Agr Sci 15.12 (2023):12809-12812
Keywords : Integrated nutrient management modules, RDF, PSB, Yield attributes, Rhizobium culture
Academic Editor : Dr D. R. Mehta
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Agronomy, Department of Agriculture Bio Chemistry, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, 224229, Uttar Pradesh, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
The present investigation was carried out at Agronomy Research Farm of Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Narendra Nagar (Kumarganj), Ayodhya (U.P.) during Ravi seasons of 2015 and 2016 to evaluate the nutrient sources through integration. The experiment consisting 12 combinations of 4 levels INM [F0: Control, F1: RDF(20kg N, 50kg P?O? ha-1) + RC (Rhizobium culture), F2: RDF(20kg N, 50kg P?O? ha-1) + PSB (Phosphorus solbulizing bacteria), F3: RDF(20kg N, 50kg P?O? ha-1) + Rhizobium culture + Phosphorus solbulizing bacteria and varieties (V1- Uday , V2- Avrodhi and V3- PUSA-362 ). The experiments were conducted in Randomized Block Design (R.B.D.) with three replications. The highest initial plant population (was recorded with RDF + RC + PSB ,which was significantly superior over control but at par with RDF + PSB and RDF + RC. The initial plant population was not significantly affected by different varieties of chickpea. The application integrated nutrient management modules treatment F3: RDF(20kg N, 50kg P?O? ha-1) and varieties (PUSA-362) were recorded significantly yield attributes (number of pod plant-1, number of grain pod-1, grain weight plant-1 and 100-grain weight) was recorded under RDF + RC+ PSB, which was significantly superior over control and RDF + RC and found at par with RDF + PSB. The variety PUSA-362 produced significant yield attributes Which was found significantly superior over Uday and at par with Avrodhi.
1. Reddy T.Y., Reddy G.H.S. (2005) Principles of agronomy. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, 2005, 25.
2. Sprent J.I. (2001) Ann. Botany, 89, 797-798.
3. Tagore G.S., Namdeo S.L., Sharma S.K. and Kumar N. (2013) International Journal of Agronomy, Volume 2013, Article ID 581627.
4. Khan M.S., Zaidi A. and Wani P. A., (2007) Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 27, 29-43.
5. Rudresh D. L.,Shivaprakash M. K. and Prasad R. D. (2005) Applied Soil Ecology, 28, 139-146.
6. Jarande N.N., Mankar P.S., Khawale V.S., Kanse A.A., Mendhe J.T. (2006) J. Soils Crops, 15,240-243.
7. Singh G., Sekhon H.S. Sharma P. (2011) Agron. Soil Sci.,57(7),715-726.
8. Patel H.A., Thanki J.D. (2020) Journal Pharmacogn Phytochem., 9(6),623-6.
9. Kumar S., Kumar S. and Kumar Y. (2007) Ann. Agric. Bio., 12, 151-155.
10. Kumar A., Reena, Nandan B., Kumar J. and Jamwal B.S. (2008) J. Food Legumes, 21(4), 231-233.
11. Raju M.S. and Verma S.C. (1984) Legume Res., 7(1), 23-26.
12. Tomar R.K.S. and Raghu J.S. (1984) Indian J. Pulse Res., 7(1), 38-40.
13. Asewar B.V., Bainade S.S., Kohire O.D. and Bainade P.S. (2003) Annals of plant Physiology, 17(2),205-206.
14. Deshmukh S.B., Kankal V.Y., Patil A.J., Shinde S.K. and Kadam J.R. (2010) Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities, 35(3), 358-361.