P. YADAV1*, V. YOGI2, V. KUMAR3
1Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur,313001, Rajasthan, India
2Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, 334006, Rajasthan, India
3Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur,313001, Rajasthan, India
* Corresponding Author : pinku.kiran.sachin@gmail.com
Received : 30-08-2023 Accepted : 28-09-2023 Published : 30-09-2023
Volume : 15 Issue : 9 Pages : 12613 - 12615
Int J Agr Sci 15.9 (2023):12613-12615
Keywords : Low tunnel technology, Economic constraints, Bottle gourd, Low tunnel, Technology hybrid seed
Academic Editor : Dr S. Krishnakumar,Dr Pratibha Gupta
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur,313001, Rajasthan, India and Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, 334006, Rajasthan, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
The study has been carried out purposively in Bikaner district of Rajasthan to ascertain constraints perceived by low tunnel technology growers of bottle gourd. A detailed interview schedule in relation to various aspects of low tunnel technology and open field was prepared and data collected from personal interview method. Farmers in the study area were asked to rank each constraint which was analyzed using Garret’s ranking technique. The study revealed that under low tunnel constraints perceived by the farmers were high cost of hybrids seed (67.16%), labour requirements (62.56%), poor-quality water (61.86%), high price of polythene sheet (48.80%), short life of polythene sheet (46.66%), lack of market information (32.10%) and Lack of technology knowledge (31.66%)
1. Lodhi A. S., Kaushal A., & Singh K. G. (2015) Apple Academic Press, 45-52.
2. Pramod R. and Dinmani (2018) Hortflora Research Spectrum, 7(1), 19-23.
3. Chakrabory H. and Sethi L.N. (2015) International Journal of Basic and Applied Biology, 5(2), 284-289.
4. Jayasurya P., Chatterjee S., Biswas A., Viswanath M., & Roy A. (2021) The Pharma Innovation Journal, 10(7), 778-783.
5. Choudhary B.R. and Saroj P.L. (2018) Indian Horticulture 63(5), 60-63.
6. Choudhary B.R. and Saroj P.L. (2019) New Age Protected Cultivation, 5(1), 15-18.
7. Saroj P.L., Ram C. and Kumar K. (2020) Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 33(1), 17-31.
8. Rani R., Meena S.R., Choudhary B.R., Jatav M.K., Saroj P.L., & Meena A. (2022) Vegetable Science, 49(2), 190-196.
9. Kumar P., Chauhan R.S., Tanwar N., & Grover R.K. (2018) Advances in Bioresearch, 9(2), 61-66.
10. Dhanavandan (2016) International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 6(3), 135-140.
11. Kolekar D.V., Meena H.R., and Bangar Y.C. (2013) Indian Veterinary Research Institute, 9(2), 104-111.
12. Sharma M. (2014) International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 2(3), 66-72.
13. Zalkuwi J., Singh R. and Bhattrai M., Singh O.P., Rao D. (2015) International Journal of Scientific and Management 5(3), 2435-2440.
14. Nimbrayan P.K., Chauhan R.S. Tanwar N. and Grover R.K. (2018) Advance Bioresearch, 9(2), 61-66.
15. Yaseen M., Luqman M., Hussain Z., Saleem U., Butt T.M., Nawaz A., & Mehmood M.U. (2020) Journal of Innovative Sciences, 6(2), 214-220.
16. Pandit J.C. & Basak N.C. (2013) Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 11(2), 193-198.