A. DAS1*, U. NAYAK2, V. KUMAR3, C.M. KHANDA4
1Sr Scientist & Head, ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bhadrak, 756111, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar, 751003, Odisha, India
2Sr Scientist, Regional Research and Technology Transfer Station (RRTTS), Ranital, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar, 751003, Odisha, India
3Scientist, Specialist, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), New Delhi, India
4Associate Director of Research, Regional Research and Technology Transfer Station (RRTTS), Bhawanipatna, 766001, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar, 751003, Odisha, India
* Corresponding Author : auroagro@gmail.com
Received : 28-10-2020 Accepted : 12-11-2020 Published : 15-11-2020
Volume : 12 Issue : 21 Pages : 10318 - 10320
Int J Agr Sci 12.21 (2020):10318-10320
Keywords : Cropping System, Grain yield, Yield attributes, Zero till, Rice-mustard, Energy saving
Academic Editor : Dr B. S. Vyakarnahal
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to ATMA, Bhadrak for providing funds for conducting farmers’ participatory trials. Authors are also thankful to ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bhadrak, 756111, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar, 751003, Odisha, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
Zero till planting an important component of conservation agriculture is found to be a potential alternative to conventional full tillage cultivation of mustard in north eastern coastal plain zone of Odisha. Farmers' participatory field trials were conducted to evaluate zero till cultivation along with different weed management practices against farmers’ practices during 2014-15 and 2015-16 in mustard crop in rice-mustard cropping system. Maximum net return of ?12750 per ha was obtained from ZT+Post herbicides significantly more than all other treatments. Grain yield and yield attributes of mustard were better under conventional tillage with line planting (T3) over other practices. ZT treatments, ZT+Post and NS+ZT produced similar grain yield as obtained by farmers’ practice of CT+BS (T5). Even though CT+LS+BS (T3) registered better grain yield, the net income (?11289) was found to be lesser than that under ZT+Post (?12750). Greater save in cost of cultivation and energy were observed under zero till planting with use of herbicide as post emergence or pre-plant application associated with higher profits. No till planting without herbicide application was found to be unprofitable during the experimentation period
1. Odisha Agriculture Statistics 2013-14 (2015) Govt of Odisha, 133.
2. Shekhawat K, Rathore S.S., Premi O.P., Kandpal B.K. and Chauhan J. S. (2012) International Journal of Agronomy, 1-14.
3. Sharif M., Haque M., Howlader M. & Hossain M. (2017) Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 14(2), 155-160.
4. Gupta K.R. (2007) Rice Wheat Consortium for Indo-Gangetic Plains. New Delhi, India.
5. Hobbs P.R., Gupta R.K., Ladha J.K. and Balasubramanian V. (2002). Rice-Wheat consortium paper series 14, pp 10-30.
6. Das T.K, Nath C.P., Das S., Biswas S., Bhattacharya R., Sudhishri S., Raj R., Singh B., Kakralia S.K., Rathi N., Sharma A.R., Dwivedi B.S., Biswas A.K. and Chaudhari S.K. (2020) Field Crops Research, 250,107781.
7. Jakhar P., Rana K.S., Dass A., Choudhary P.K., Meena M.C. and Choudhary M. (2018) Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88 (1).
8. Teja K.C and Duary B (2018) Indian Journal of Weed Science, 50(4), 340–344.
9. Parihar C. M., Bhakar R. N., Rana K. S., Jat M. L., Singh A. K., Jat S. L., Parihar M. D. and Sharma S. (2013) African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(10), 903-915.
10. Gomez K.A. and Gomez A.A. (2010) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd Ed., P.704, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
11. Bhanu A.N., Srivastava K. and Singh R.K. (2019) Acta Scientific Agriculture, 3(8), 70-79.
12. Monika A., Sing R., Feroze S.M. and Singh R.J. (2014) Economic Affairs, 59(3), 335-343
13. Tripathi R.S., Singh R. and Suresh R. (2006) Agricultural Economics Research Review, 19, 208.
14. Singh N.P., Singh R.P., Kumar R., Vashist A.K., Khan F. and Varghese N. (2011) Agricultural Economics Research Review, 24, 15-24.
15. Parmanand and Verma P.D. (2017) Trends in biosciences, 10(24), 4965-4969.