EFFECT OF CASTRATION ON CARCASS TRAITS IN CROSSBRED PIGS

V.N. GAUTAM1*, S. SHRIVASTAVA2, G.P. LAKHANI3, R.P.S. BAGHEL4, K.N. TRIPATHI5
1Department of Livestock Production and Management, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Jawaharlal Nehru Agricultural University, Adhartal, Jabalpur, 482004, Madhya Pradesh, India
2Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, Maheba Dist. Chhatarpur, 482001, Madhya Pradesh, India
3Department of Livestock Production and Management, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Jawaharlal Nehru Agricultural University, Adhartal, Jabalpur, 482004, Madhya Pradesh, India
4Department of Livestock Production and Management, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Jawaharlal Nehru Agricultural University, Adhartal, Jabalpur, 482004, Madhya Pradesh, India
5Integrated Watershed Management Programme in Chhattisgarh Project Baikunthpur Korea c.g., 492006, India
* Corresponding Author : drvngautam15@gmail.com

Received : 27-04-2018     Accepted : 11-08-2018     Published : 15-08-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 15       Pages : 6832 - 6834
Int J Agr Sci 10.15 (2018):6832-6834

Keywords : Body length, Chest girth, Height at withers, Feed intake, Feed efficiency
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to Jawaharlal Nehru Agricultural University, Krishinagar, Adhartal, Jabalpur, 482004, Madhya Pradesh, India
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : GAUTAM, V.N., et al "EFFECT OF CASTRATION ON CARCASS TRAITS IN CROSSBRED PIGS." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10.15 (2018):6832-6834.

Cite - APA : GAUTAM, V.N., SHRIVASTAVA, S., LAKHANI, G.P., BAGHEL, R.P.S., TRIPATHI, K.N. (2018). EFFECT OF CASTRATION ON CARCASS TRAITS IN CROSSBRED PIGS. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10 (15), 6832-6834.

Cite - Chicago : GAUTAM, V.N., S. SHRIVASTAVA, G.P. LAKHANI, R.P.S. BAGHEL, and K.N. TRIPATHI. "EFFECT OF CASTRATION ON CARCASS TRAITS IN CROSSBRED PIGS." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10, no. 15 (2018):6832-6834.

Copyright : © 2018, V.N. GAUTAM, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Castration in males consists of the removal of the testes or the inhibition of testicular function. Although the prevalence of castration in pigs varies from country to country, it is generally a routine practice that is performed surgically. Surgical castration is an acute stressor that can affect the behaviour, endocrine and immune responses of pigs Therefore, it may impair the health and welfare of these animals. This could be of particular concern at weaning, which constitutes a severe nutritional, physical and psychological stressor often associated with increased disease susceptibility. The present investigation was undertaken to elucidate the effect of castration on the performance of crossbred pigs. Total 20 weaned male piglets of 2 months age pertaining to Large White Yorkshire crosses with desi pigs were procured and randomly allotted to two groups (Castrated and uncastrated) containing 10pigs each. Pigs were kept at piggery unit from 15 December 2009 to May 2010 of Livestock farm, Adhartal, Jabalpur. Growth parameters were taken at fortnight intervals. The carcass weight and dressing percentage for the castrated and uncastrated groups are given is found to be significantly (P<0.05) higher in castrated (48.69 ± 0.36) than the uncastrated (47.91 ± 0.31). Similarly, the dressing percentage was also found to be higher in the castrated groups (71.09 ± 0.25) than the uncastrated groups (68.21±0.39) respectively. The mean ± S.E. of height in castrated and uncastrated groups of pigs at different fortnight intervals 6.5 months 27.81a ± 0.09 ,26.01± 0.18 respectively. The chest girth (inc.) from 56 to 195 days of age in castrated and uncastrated groups are 6.5 months 38.70a ± 0.16 ,37.24b ± 0.12 respectively.

References

1. Pandey R.N., S.K. Singh, R.L. Singh, C.B. Dubey and N.R.P. Sinha, (1996) Indian J. Anim. Sci., 66, 797-805.
2. Banerjee G.C., (1998) A Text book of Animal Husbandry. 8th Ed., Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt Ltd., New Delhi, pp. 778.
3. Singh U.B., Mehra U.R. Sinhe AP. and Srivastava U.S. (1991) Indian J Dairy Sci., 44 (5), 305-308.
4. Amusana Singh, K., D.R. Nath and A.B. Sarkar, (1983) Cheiron, 12, 231-236.
5. Balanchard P.J., Ellis M.E., Warkup C.C., Chadwick J.P. and Willis M.B., (1999) Anim. Sci., 68, 487-493.
6. Blair R and P.R. English, (1965) J. Agri. Sci (Camb.)., 64,169.
7. Castell A.G., Cliplef R.L. and McKay R.M. (1985) Can J. Anim. Sci., 65, 821-834.
8. Chang W.K., Chung I.B., Kim V.G. and Cheong S.K. (1990) Effect of castration on growth, food conversion and carcass character in pigs. Research reports of the Rural Development Administration, Livestock, Korea Republic, 32, 12-16.
9. Dexamir, A. and Georgescu D., (1983) Effect of form of feed on performance of pigs for meat. 1. Effect of pelleting mixed feed. Pig News info., 4,1623.
10. Dexamir A., E. Glovaci and G. Spiridon, (1983) Effect of form of feed on performance of pigs for meat. 2.Effect of dry or moist feed. Pig news info., 4, 1624.
11. F.A.O. (2000) Production year book Vol.44. Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations, Rome, Italy.
12. Goswami R.N. and Raina B.L.(1983) Indian J. Anim. Sci, 53(1), 97-100.
13. Hansson, I. (1974) Swed. J. Agric. Res., 4, 209-218.
14. Jogi S. (1997) Indian J. Anim. Res., 31,25-28.
15. Kanis E and Koops W.J., (1990) Animal Prod., 50, 353-364.
16. Lakhani G.P., Jogi S. and Kahlon B.S., (1997) Indian J. Anim. Res., 31, 18-20.
17. Malmfors B and Hansson J., (1974) Livest. Prod. Sci., 7, 411-420.
18. Newell J.A. and Bowland J.P., (1972) Can. J. Anim. Sci., 55, 543 - 551.
19. Ramaswami A.M., J. Alfred Jayaprasad, Radhakrishnan K.T. and Kannan G. (1992) Indian J. Anim. Res., 26, 67-74.
20. Sander A.P., Martin A.H. and Freeden H.E., (1980) J. Anim. Sci., 64, 1412-1418.
21. Teague H.S., Plimpton R.F., caHill V.R., Grifo A.P. and Kunkle, L.E. (1964) J.Anim. Sci., 23, 332-338.
22. Van Lunet, T.A. and D.J.A. Cole, (1996) Animal Sci., 63, 465-475.
23. Walstra P. (1969) Experiments in the Netherlands on the effect of castration of pigs in relation to feeding level. In meat productions from entire male animals. D. N.Rhodes, J. and A. Churchill Limited, London, pp: 129-141.
24. Xue J.L., Dial G.D. and Pcttigrew I.E., (1997) Swine Health Prod., 5, 21.
25. Yadav B.P.S., S. Arun Varma and Gupta J.J., (1993) Indian J. Anim. Sci., 63, 1094-1096.
26. Ziegler P.T. (1968) The meat we eat. Interstate printers and publishers Inc. Danville, Illinois, U.S.A.