ANALYSING PRADHAN MANTRI KAUSHAL VIKAS YOJANA FROM THE LENS OF TRAINING LITERATURE

S. GUPTA¹, S.K. KASHYAP²*
¹Fellow Programme in Management, Indian Institute of Management, Indore, 453556, Madhya Pradesh
²Professor & Head, Department of Agricultural Communication, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar 263145, Uttarakhand, India
* Corresponding Author : kashyapsk@gmail.com

Received : 14-06-2018     Accepted : 23-06-2018     Published : 30-06-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 12       Pages : 6408 - 6410
Int J Agr Sci 10.12 (2018):6408-6410

Keywords : Training effectiveness, PMKVY, Effectiveness of PMKVY, Motivation to Learn
Academic Editor : Dr Rahul Singh Arya
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to Indian Institute of Management, Indore, 453556, Madhya Pradesh, for providing the insight of this review. Author also thankful to Department of Agricultural Communication, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar 263145, Uttarakhand, India.
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

The Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) was approved by the Union Cabinet of India on March 20, 2015 and was then launched on July 15, 2015. The Scheme has detailed guidelines for selection, functioning, infrastructure requirements, financial dealings, and course provision for Training Centres and Training Partners. But, the entire Scheme lacks any guidelines and directions on the training pedagogy, except for a certification for the trainer from Sector Skills Council of India and training structures. This paper is an attempt to design a conceptual model for the better functioning and efficient outcomes of this campaign. The model focuses on the factors affecting motivation to learn and the ultimate training effectiveness.

1. Arthur Jr W., Bennett Jr W., Edens P. S. and Bell S. T. (2003) Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 234.
2. Axtell C. M., Maitlis S. and Yearta S. K. (1997) Personnel Review, 26(3), 201-213.
3. Baldwin T.T. and Ford J.K. (1988) Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63-105.
4. Blume B. D., Ford J. K., Baldwin T. T. and Huang J. L. (2010) Journal of Management, 36(4), 1065-1105.
5. Burke L. A. and Hutchins H. M. (2007) Human Resource Development Review, 6(3), 263-296.
6. Chaugule Suryakant Ratan (2015) Indian Journal of Applied Research, 5(11), 157-159.
7. Cheng E. W. and Ho D. C. (2001) Personnel Review, 30(1), 102-118.
8. Clark C. S., Dobbins G. H. and Ladd R. T. (1993) Group and Organization Management, 18(3), 292-307.
9. Colquitt J. A., LePine J. A. and Noe R. A. (2000) Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 678-707.
10. Deka R. J. and Batra B. (2016) International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences, 4(4), 275-282.
11. Facteau J. D., Dobbins G. H., Russell J. E., Ladd R. T. and Kudisch J. D. (1995) Journal of Management, 21(1), 1-25.
12. Kirkpatrick D. (1996) Training and Development, 50(1), 54-59.
13. Kontoghiorghes C. (2002) Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(3), 114-129.
14. Lim D. H. and Morris M. L. (2006) Human Resource Development Quarterly, 17(1), 85-115.
15. Kumar A. (2017) International Journal of Engineering and Management Research (IJEMR), 7(3), 66-68.
16. Mathieu J. E., Tannenbaum S. I. and Salas E. (1992) Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 828-847.
17. Noe R. A. (1986) Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 736-749.
18. Singh V. (2016) Journal of Rural and Industrial Development, 4(1), 23 -33.
19. Switzer K. C., Nagy M. S. and Mullins M. E. (2005) Applied HRM Research, 10(1), 21-34.
20. Van Eerde W., Simon Tang K. C. and Talbot G. (2008) The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 63-73.
21. Velada R., Caetano A., Michel J. W., Lyons B. D. and Kavanagh M. J. (2007) International Journal of Training and Development, 11(4), 282-294.
22. Yamnill S. and McLean G. N. (2001) Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(2), 195-208.