INFLUENCE OF ROOTSTOCKS AND SCIONS ON HORTICULTURAL TRAITS AND QUALITY OF TOMATO UNDER PROTECTED CONDITIONS

PARDEEP KUMAR1*, PARVEEN SHARMA2, BINNY VATS3
1Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176062 India
2Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176062 India
3Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176062 India
* Corresponding Author : pardeepsangla@gmail.com

Received : 19-01-2018     Accepted : 28-01-2018     Published : 30-01-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 2       Pages : 5085 - 5087
Int J Agr Sci 10.2 (2018):5085-5087

Keywords : Tomato, Grafting, Rootstock, Scion, Bacterial wilt, Protected Cultivation.
Academic Editor : Sagar Anand Pandey
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176062
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : KUMAR, PARDEEP, et al "INFLUENCE OF ROOTSTOCKS AND SCIONS ON HORTICULTURAL TRAITS AND QUALITY OF TOMATO UNDER PROTECTED CONDITIONS." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10.2 (2018):5085-5087.

Cite - APA : KUMAR, PARDEEP, SHARMA, PARVEEN, VATS, BINNY (2018). INFLUENCE OF ROOTSTOCKS AND SCIONS ON HORTICULTURAL TRAITS AND QUALITY OF TOMATO UNDER PROTECTED CONDITIONS. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10 (2), 5085-5087.

Cite - Chicago : KUMAR, PARDEEP, PARVEEN SHARMA, and BINNY VATS. "INFLUENCE OF ROOTSTOCKS AND SCIONS ON HORTICULTURAL TRAITS AND QUALITY OF TOMATO UNDER PROTECTED CONDITIONS." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10, no. 2 (2018):5085-5087.

Copyright : © 2018, PARDEEP KUMAR, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

A study was undertaken to identify best rootstock and scion for tomato growth, development and yield under protected conditions at CSKHPKV, palampur. The experiment consisted of eight rootstocks viz. Pumpkin Jalag, 2123 A-1 (Tomato), Hawaii 7998 (Tomato), Palam Pink (Tomato), Hawaii 7996 (Tomato), Palam Pride (Tomato), Arka Nidhi (Brinjal) and Arka Keshav (Brinjal) and three tomato varieties as scions viz. Rakshita, Naveen 2000+ and GS-600.Results obtained indicated that treatment T-2(2123 A-1 + Rakshita) resulted in highest fruit yield per plant, longest harvest duration, highest TSS, maximum plant height and maximum number of fruits per plant. Treatment T-7 (Palam Pride + Naveen 2000+) took minimum days to first harvest whereas, treatment T-9 (Arka Keshav + Naveen 2000+) and T-8 (Arka Nidhi + Rakshita) recorded highest ascorbic acid and highest lycopene contents, respectively. Suitable rootstocks identified for tomato are 2123 A-1, Arka Nidhi, Arka Keshav, Palam Pride. These results showed that grafting could be an advantageous alternative in tomato production under protected conditions.

References

1. Anonymous (2013) Urban and Peri-urban Agriculture. National Academy of Agricultural Sciences Policy Paper: 67
2. Anonymous (2015) Indian Horticulture Database-2014. National Horticulture Broad, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, Gurgaon, Haryana.
3. Sood A.K. and Singh B.M. (1992) Australian Center for International Research (ACIR), 45, 358-361.
4. Kumar P., Rana S., Sharma P. and Negi V. (2015) Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, 41(1), 1-5
5. Lee J. and Oda M. (2003) Horticulture Reviews, 28, 61-124
6. Lee J.M., Kubota C., Tsao S.J., Bie Z., Echevarria P.H., Morra L. and Oda M. (2010) Scientia Horticulturae, 127(2), 93-105
7. Rivard CL. and Louws FJ. (2008) Horticulture Science, 43(7), 2104-2111.
8. Venema J.H., Dijk B.E., Bax J.M., van Hasselt P.R. and Elzenga J.T.M. (2008) Environmental and Experimental Botany, 63, 359-367
9. Colla G., Rouphael Y., Leonardi C. and Bie Z. (2010) Science Horticulture, 127, 147-155
10. Dong H.H., Niu Y.H., Li W.J. and Zang D.M. (2008) Journal of Experimental Botany, 59, 1295-1304
11. Rouphael Y., Schwarz D., Krumbein A. and Colla G. (2008) Horticulture Science, 43, 730-736
12. Khah E.M., Kakava E., Mavromatis A., Chachalis C. and Goulas C. (2006) J. Appl. Hort., 89(1), 3-7.
13. Gisbert C., Torres P.S., Raigon M.D. and Nuez F. (2010) J. Food, Agric. & Env., 8(1), 116-121.
14. Ibrahim A., Wahb-Allah M., Abdel-Razzak H. and Alsadon A. (2014) Life Sci. J., 11(2), 118-126.
15. Lee J.M. (1994) Horticulture Science, 29(4), 235-239
16. King S.R., Davis A.R., Zhang X. and Crosby K. (2010) Sci. Hortic., 127, 106-111.
17. Passam H.C., Stylianou M. and Kotsiras A. (2005) Euro. J. Hort. Sci., 70(3), 130-134.
18. Marin J.L., Gongalez A., Alfocea F.P., Gilabert C.E. and Fernandez J.A. (2013) Sci. Hortic., 149, 39-46.
19. Turhan A., Ozmen N., Serbeci M.S. and Seniz V. (2011) Horticulture Science, 38(4), 142-149.
20. Barrett C.E., Zhao X., Sims C.A., Brecht J.K., Dreyer E.Q. and Gao Z. (2012) Hort. Technology, 22(6), 804-809.
21. Davis A.R., Veazie P.P., Hassell R., Levi A., King S.R. and Zhang X. (2008) Hort. Sci., 43(6), 1670-1672.
22. Poudel S.R. and Lee W.S. (2009) Horticulture NCHU, 34(2), 39-52.