SASMITA PRIYADARSHINI1, GHANASHYAM SINGH RAWAT2, SANAT KUMAR DWIBEDI3*
1Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, 474002, India
2Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, 474002, India
3Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Surya Nagar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751003, India
* Corresponding Author : sanatdwibedi@rediffmail.com
Received : 18-09-2017 Accepted : 22-09-2017 Published : 24-09-2017
Volume : 9 Issue : 44 Pages : 4722 - 4724
Int J Agr Sci 9.44 (2017):4722-4724
Keywords : Cluster bean, fertility level, row spacing, genotype
Academic Editor : Dr Ranjan Tarai, Abhiram Dash
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : The technical and informative supports of the College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraja Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India for conducting such post-graduation field research of the first author are highly acknowledged
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed
A field experiment consisting of 2 fertility levels viz. 50 % of recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) and 100 % RDF (20: 40: 20 kg ha-1 of N: P2O5: K2O); 2 row spacings (30 and 45 cm) and 3 genotypes (HG-100, HG-8-1 and HG-563(c)) was conducted at the Research Farm, College of Agriculture, Gwalior, India during kharif 2010 to find out their effects on grain, stover and grain-protein yield and production economics of cluster bean. The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design with 12 treatment combinations and 3 replications. The highest grain, stover and grain-protein yield could be recorded in 100 % RDF, 45 cm row spacing and HG-100 and that were significantly superior to other treatment combinations. Cluster bean genotype HG-100 sown at 45 cm row spacing with 100 % RDF appeared to be better combination for higher production and net return. However, to get maximum dividend in terms of the highest benefit: cost ratio, HG-100 sown at 45 cm row spacing with 50 % RDF was found to be economical.
1. Rajput R.S. (2002) Response of cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L. Taub) varieties to varying fertility level and row spacing in northern Madhya Pradesh. M. Sc. (Ag.) in Agronomy thesis, JNKVV, Jabalpur.
2. Piper C.S. (1950) Adelaide University of Adelaide, pp. 223-27 and 77-79.
3. Gomez K.A. and Gomez A.A. (1984) Wiley India. pp. 200-206.
4. Rathore V.S., Singh J.P., Soni, M.L. and Beniwal R.K. (2007) Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 77(6), 349-53.
5. Singh Raj and Khan M.A. (2002) National Symposium on Arid Legumes for Food, Nutrition Security and Promotion of Trade, May 15-16. pp.8.
6. Jain V., Yadav B.D., Sharma B.D. and Taneja K.D. (1987) Indian Journal of Agronomy, 32(4), 378-382.
7. Yadav B.D., Agrawal S.K. and Arora S.K. (1989) Guar Research Annals, 5, 8-13.
8. Yadav B.D., Joon R.K. and Sheoran R.S. (1992) Forage Research, 18(2), 157-159.
9. Singh N.P., Singh R.V., Choudhary S.P.S., Khedar O.P. and Saini D.D. (2005) Breeding dual type guar varieties for arid zone. National Symposium on Advances in Forage Research and Sustainable Animal Production, held at CCSHAU, Hisar, pp-18.
10. Sheoran R.S. and Rana D.S. (2007) Forage Research, 32(4), 243-244.