EVALUATION AND LONG TERM STUDY OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FOR ANAND REGION

H.K. AHIR1*, B.M. SUTHAR2, N.J. CHAUDHARI3, D.D. PATIL4, M. KULSHRESTHA5
1Department of Agricultural Meteorology, Anand Agricultural University, Anand India
2Department of Agricultural Meteorology, Anand Agricultural University, Anand India
3Department of Agricultural Meteorology, Anand Agricultural University, Anand India
4Department of Agricultural Meteorology, Anand Agricultural University, Anand India
5Department of Agricultural Meteorology, Anand Agricultural University, Anand India
* Corresponding Author : hasmukh9033@gmail.com

Received : 02-05-2017     Accepted : 11-05-2017     Published : 30-05-2017
Volume : 9     Issue : 25       Pages : 4315 - 4318
Int J Agr Sci 9.25 (2017):4315-4318

Keywords : Reference evapotranspiration, FAO Penman-Monteith (FAO56), Crop evapotranspiration
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : This research supported by Department of Agriculture Meteorology, Anand Agricultural University, Anand. We would like to thankful Department of Agriculture Meteorology was provided Meteorology data
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : AHIR, H.K., et al "EVALUATION AND LONG TERM STUDY OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FOR ANAND REGION." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 9.25 (2017):4315-4318.

Cite - APA : AHIR, H.K., SUTHAR, B.M., CHAUDHARI, N.J., PATIL, D.D., KULSHRESTHA, M. (2017). EVALUATION AND LONG TERM STUDY OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FOR ANAND REGION. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 9 (25), 4315-4318.

Cite - Chicago : AHIR, H.K., B.M. SUTHAR, N.J. CHAUDHARI, D.D. PATIL, and M. KULSHRESTHA. "EVALUATION AND LONG TERM STUDY OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FOR ANAND REGION." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 9, no. 25 (2017):4315-4318.

Copyright : © 2017, H.K. AHIR, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

This paper represents estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) with fifteen different methods. Meteorological daily data were used as input parameter to estimate evapotranspiration (ET0) of 31 years (1984-2015) of Anand station. The FAO 56PM method was used to compare with 1996 KPen, 1948 pn, FP17 pen, CIMICFAO pen, FAO 24Rd, FAO 24BC, 1985 pan, Prs-Harg, 1957 Tylr, 1961 Makk ETo. Out of all the methods, 1996 Kpen, 1948 pen and FP 17pen methods were found very close to FAO 56PM method with coefficient of determination (R2) 0.98, 0.99 and 0.98 respectively. The yearly maximum and minimum values of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) were 6.15 mm/year and 3.34 mm/year and for monthly it was 9.62 mm/month and 2.1mm/month of all the methods.

References

1. Jensen M. E., Burman R. D. and Allen R. G. (1990) Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements: a manual. ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice (USA). no. 70
2. Water Requirements. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 70, Am. Soc. Civil Engr., New York, NY. 332 pp.
3. Lu Z., et al. (2005) J Biol Chem 280 (33), 29689-98
4. Adeboye M. K. A., Osunde A. O., Ezenwa M. I. S., Odofin A. J. and Bala A. (2009) Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 19(2), pp. 115-120.
5. Yates D. N. and Strzepek K. M. (1994) The Impact of Potential Evapotranspiration methodology on the determination of River Runof. IIASA Working Paper, WP-94-46, Laxenburg, Austria.
6. Hossein Tabari , Amir AghaKouchak, Patrick Willems (2014) Journal of Hydrology, 519, 1420–1427.
7. McMahon T. A., Peel M. C., Lowe L., Srikanthan R. and McVicar T. R. (2013) Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1331–1363, doi: 10.5194/hess-17-1331-2013.
8. Allen R. G., Pereira L. S., Raes D. and Smith M. (1998) FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, Rome, 15 pp..
9. Xu C.-Y. and Singh V. P. (2000) Hydrol. Process, 14, 339–349.
10. Allen C. C., Morris R. V. and McKay D. S. (1996) Journal of Geophysical Research, 101, doi: 10.1029/96JE02726. issn: 0148-0227.
11. Chiew F.H.S., Kamaladasa N.N., Malano H.M., McMahon Penman-Monteith T.A. FAO-24 reference crop evapotranspiration and class- pan data in Australia: Department Civil and Environmental Engineering, University Melbourne Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
12. Rohitashw Kumar, Vijay Shankar and Mahesh Kumar (2016) Universal Journal of Environmental Research and Technology, 1(3), 239-246.
13. Doorenbos J. and Pruitt W.O. (1977) Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 24.144 pps (revised version of the 1975 edition). FAO, Rome.
14. Allen R. G., Smith M., Perrier A. and Pereira L. S. (1994) ICID Bulletin, 43, pp.1-34, 1994.
15. Hargreaves G. H., Samani Z. A. (1985) Transaction of ASAE, 1(2),96-99.
16. Makkink G. F. (1957) Journal of the Institution of Water Engineers, 11, 277–288
17. Itenfisuel D., Elliott R. L., Allen R. G. and Walter I. A. (2000) Proc. of the National Irrigation Symposium, ASAE, 14-16, Phoenix, pp.216-227.
18. Othoman Alkaeed, Clariza Flores, Kenji Jinno and Atsushi Tsutsumi (2006) Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, 66(1).