INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ORGANIC MANURES AND BIO-FERTILISERS ON MORPHOLOGICAL, FLORAL AND BULB TRAITS OF NARCISSUS (DAFFODIL Cv. SALOME)

NASIR HAMID MASOODI1*, M.A.A. SIDDIQUE2, FAHMEEDA SAJAD3, SHAMEEN IQBAL4, MUNEEB AHMAD WANI5
1Division of Floriculture and Landscape Architecture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Shalimar, Srinagar, 190025
2Division of Floriculture and Landscape Architecture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Shalimar, Srinagar, 190025
3Division of Floriculture and Landscape Architecture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Shalimar, Srinagar, 190025
4Division of Floriculture and Landscape Architecture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Shalimar, Srinagar, 190025
5Division of Floriculture and Landscape Architecture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Shalimar, Srinagar, 190025
* Corresponding Author : masoodi_nasir@yahoo.com

Received : 22-10-2016     Accepted : 15-02-2017     Published : 28-02-2017
Volume : 9     Issue : 10       Pages : 3989 - 3992
Int J Agr Sci 9.10 (2017):3989-3992

Keywords : Bulb, Bio-Fertilizer, Floral, Growth, Yield
Academic Editor : Prashant Kisanrao Nimbolkar, Dr Sujata Upadhyay
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : The authors are thankful to DST Govt of J&K for funding assistance to the project entitled “Development of pre and post harvest management technologies for Narcissus (Daffodils) as through this intervention work has been initiated on different aspects related to narcissus daffodils
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : MASOODI, NASIR HAMID, et al "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ORGANIC MANURES AND BIO-FERTILISERS ON MORPHOLOGICAL, FLORAL AND BULB TRAITS OF NARCISSUS (DAFFODIL Cv. SALOME)." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 9.10 (2017):3989-3992.

Cite - APA : MASOODI, NASIR HAMID, SIDDIQUE, M.A.A., SAJAD, FAHMEEDA, IQBAL, SHAMEEN, WANI, MUNEEB AHMAD (2017). INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ORGANIC MANURES AND BIO-FERTILISERS ON MORPHOLOGICAL, FLORAL AND BULB TRAITS OF NARCISSUS (DAFFODIL Cv. SALOME). International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 9 (10), 3989-3992.

Cite - Chicago : MASOODI, NASIR HAMID, M.A.A. SIDDIQUE, FAHMEEDA SAJAD, SHAMEEN IQBAL, and MUNEEB AHMAD WANI. "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ORGANIC MANURES AND BIO-FERTILISERS ON MORPHOLOGICAL, FLORAL AND BULB TRAITS OF NARCISSUS (DAFFODIL Cv. SALOME)." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 9, no. 10 (2017):3989-3992.

Copyright : © 2017, NASIR HAMID MASOODI, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Experiment was conducted with an aim to know the effect of different organic manures and bio-fertilizers on morphological, floral and bulb traits on Narcissus (Daffodil) cv. “Salome”. Seven different nutrient combinations were tested with distinct range of organic manures viz. vermicompost (1.5 t/h,2.5t/h, 5 tones /ha,), Sheep manure (1.5t/ha, 2.5t/h, 5 t/h) and recommended dose of NPK without organic manures as control treatment. In addition to these manures, all bulbs were treated with Azotobacter and Phosphorus Solubilising Bacteria (PSB) before planting. It was observed that treatment T3 (Vermicompost 5t/ha+ Azotobacter+ PSB) resulted with earliness in bulb sprouting, bud initiation and to reach goose neck stage. However, the treatment T5 (1.25 t/ha vermicompost +1.5t/ha sheep manure+ Azotobacter+ PSB) resulted in delay of bulb sprouting, bud initiation and duration to reach goose neck stage. From qualitative parameters point of view maximum tepal length (34.61mm), spa the length (40.97cm), flower diameter (79.47mm) and duration of flowering (26.86 days) resulted with the treatment T3 and minimum values for all these traits were observed with treatment T5. Bulb weight was recorded maximum (24.48g) with treatment T3 (vermicompost 5t/h+ Azotobacter +PSB) and minimum (16.12g) with treatment T5 (1.5 t/h sheep manure+ Azotobacter +PSB) while as bulb diameter followed the same trend with maximum (33.21mm) with T3 and minimum (20.10mm) with T5.

References

1. Awasthi R.P., Godara P.K. and Kaith N.S. (1998) The Horticulture Journal., 11 (2), 1-5.
2. Barea J.M., Navarro E. and Montoya E. (1976) J. Appl. Bacteriol., 40, 129-134.
3. Barman D., Datta M., De L.C. and Banik S. (2003) Indian J. Hort., 60(3), 303-306.
4. Brown M.E. and Burlingham S.K. (1968) J. Gen. Microbiol., 53, 135-144.
5. Chandrikapure K.R., Sadawrte K.T., Panchbhai D.M. and Shelke B.D. (1999) Orissa J. Hort., 27(2), 31-34.
6. Gangadharan G.D. and Gopinath G. (2000) Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 13(2), 401-405.
7. Gaur A.C. (1990) Phosphorus solublizing micro organisms as biofertilizers Omega Scientific Publishers. New Delhi pp.63-90.
8. Gayantri H.N., Jayaprasad K.V. and Narayanaswami P. (2004) Journal of Ornamental Horticulture, 7(1), 70-74.
9. Muneeb A Wani, Imtiyaz T Nazki, Ambreena Din (2015) Journal of Plant Stress Physiology, 1(1), 7-12.
10. Narasimha Raju S. and Haripriya K. (2001) South Indian Hort., 49, 181-184.
11. Narula N. and Yadav K.S. (1989) Nitrogen fixation research in India with Azotobacter. In: Biological nitrogen fixation research in India, Dadarwal, K.R. and Yadav, K.S. (eds) pp. 87-140.
12. Nieto K.F. and Frankenberger W.T. (1989) Soil Biol. Biochem., 21, 967-972.
13. Prakash A.N. and Madalageri B.B. (1989) Prog. Hort., 21(1-2), 179-181.
14. Sartaj A. Wani , S.Chand, Muneeb A. Wani, M. Ramzan and K. R. Hakeem. Azotobacter chroococcum – A Potential Biofertilizer in Agriculture: An Overview. Soil Science: Agricultural and Environmental Prospectives. pp 333-348.
15. Subba Rao (1982) Biofertilizers in agriculture, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi pp.77-91.
16. Swaminathan V., Ramaswamy N. and Pillai O.A.A. (1999) South Indian Hort., 47(1-6), 331-334.
17. Vasanthi D. and Kumaraswamy K. (1999) Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science, 48(3), 510-515.
18. Vendan R.T. and Subramanian M. (2000) Crop. Res., 19(2), 194-197.
19. Wani M. A., Nazki I.T., Mehraj S., Din A., Neelofar Shaziya Hassan, Q.J.A Peer. (2016) Diversification through Floriculture in Kashmir Valley. In: Anil Bhat;S.P Singh, ed. Agricultural Marketing: Perspectives and Potentials. Jammu: nipa; 209-233. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4065.2569/1
20. Ali A., Tahir T., Rashid H., Ajmal B., Sajjad R., Najam-ud-Din, Adeel A. (2014) International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences, 4, 94-99.
21. Khan F.U., Siddique M.A.A., Khan F.A. and Nazki I.T. (2009) Indian journal of agricultural science, 79(4), 248-251.
22. Moghadam A.R.L., Ardebili Z.O., Fateme Saidi F. (2012) African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(17), 2609-2621.DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.1806
23. Sheergojri G.A., Neelofar, Rather Z.A., Khan F.U., Nazki I.T., Qadri Z.A. (2013) Applied Biological Research, 15 (2), 121-129.
24. Waheeduzzama M., Jawaharlal M., Arulmozhiyan R. and Indhumathi K. (2006) J. Orna. Hort., 9(2), 142-144.
25. Wani M.A., Imtiyaz T. Nazki, Sajid A. Malik & Ambreena Din and Z. A. Rather (2016) Agricultural Research, 5(3), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-016-0222-x