STUDY AND COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FACE RECOGNITION ALGORITHMS

Vaibhav Pathak1, D.N. Patwari2, P.B. Khanale3, N.M. Tamboli4, Vishal M. Pathak5
1Shri Shivaji College, Parbhani
2Shri Shivaji College, Parbhani
3D.S.M. Parbhani
4M.A.U., Parbhani
5M.G.M’s CS & IT Parbhani

Received : -     Accepted : -     Published : 15-12-2011
Volume : 1     Issue : 1       Pages : 5 - 9
Bioinfo Med Imag 1.1 (2011):5-9

Cite - MLA : Vaibhav Pathak , et al "STUDY AND COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FACE RECOGNITION ALGORITHMS." BIOINFO Medical Imaging 1.1 (2011):5-9.

Cite - APA : Vaibhav Pathak , D.N. Patwari, P.B. Khanale, N.M. Tamboli , Vishal M. Pathak (2011). STUDY AND COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FACE RECOGNITION ALGORITHMS. BIOINFO Medical Imaging, 1 (1), 5-9.

Cite - Chicago : Vaibhav Pathak , D.N. Patwari, P.B. Khanale, N.M. Tamboli , and Vishal M. Pathak "STUDY AND COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FACE RECOGNITION ALGORITHMS." BIOINFO Medical Imaging 1, no. 1 (2011):5-9.

Copyright : © 2011, Vaibhav Pathak, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Face recognition is one of the most successful applications of image analysis and understanding and has gained much attention in recent years. Among many approaches to the problem of face recognition, appearance-based subspace analysis still gives the most promising results. In this paper we study the three most popular appearance-based face recognition projection methods (PCA, LDA and ICA). All methods are tested in equal working conditions regarding preprocessing and algorithm implementation on the FERET and AT&T data set with its standard tests. We also compare the ICA method with its whitening preprocess and find out that there is no significant difference between them. When we compare different projection with different metrics we found out that the LDA+COS combination is the most promising for all tasks. The L1 metric gives the best results in combination with PCA and ICA1, and COS is superior to any other metric when used with LDA and ICA2. Our results are compared to other studies and some discrepancies are pointed out.

References

[1] Zhao, W., Chellappa, R., Phillips, P.J., Rosenfeld, A.: Face Recognition: A Literature Survey, ACM Computing Surveys, (2003) 399–458  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus  

[2] Solina, F.,Peer, P., Batagelj, B., Juvan, S., Kovaˇc, J.: Color- Based Face Detection in the ”15 Seconds of Fame” Art Installation, International Conference on Computer Vision / Computer Graphics Collaboration for Model-based Imaging, Rendering, image Analysis and Graphical special Effects MIRAGE’03, (2003) 38–47  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus  

[3] Turk, M., Pentland, A.: Eigenfaces for Recognition, Journal of Cognitive Neurosicence, 3(1), 1991, 71–86  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus  

[4] Zhao, W., Chellappa, R., Krishnaswamy, A.: Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components for Face Recognition, Proc. of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Face and Gesture Recognition, FG’98, (1998) 336  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus  

[5] Bartlett, M.S., Movellan, J.R., Sejnowski, T.J.: Face Recognition by Independent Component Analysis, IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, 13(6), (2002) 1450–1464  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus  

[6] Draper, B., Baek, K., Bartlett, M.S., Beveridge, J.R.: Recognizing Faces with PCA and ICA, Computer Vision and Image Understanding (Spacial Issue on Face Recognition), 91(1-2), (2003) 115–137  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus  

[7] Hyv¨arinen, A., Oja, E.: Independent component analysis: algorithms and aplications. Neural Networks. 13(4-5) (2000) 411–430  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus  

[8] Yang, J., Zhang, D., Yang, J.Y.: Is ICA Significantly Better than PCA for Face Recognition? ICCV. (2005) 198–203  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus  

[9] Phillips, P.J., Moon, H., Rizvi, S.A., Rauss, P.J.: The FERET Evaluation Methodology for Face-Recognition Algorithms, IEEE Trans. on Pattern Recognition and Machince Intelligence, 22(10), (2000) 1090–1104  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus  

[10] Liu, C., Wechsler, H.: Comparative Assessment of Independent Component Analysis (ICA) for Face Rcognition, Second International Conference on Audio- and Video-based Biometric Person Authentication, (1999) 22–23  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus  

[11] Baek, K., Draper, B., Beveridge, J.R., She, K.: PCA vs. ICA: A Comparison on the FERET Data Set, Proc. of the Fourth International Conference on Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition and Image Processing, (8-14), (2002) 824–827  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus  

[12] Moghaddam, B.: Principal Manifolds and Probabilistic Subspaces for Visual Recognition, IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Inteligence, 24(6), 2002 780–788  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus  

[13] Beveridge, J.R., She, K., Draper, B., Givens, G.H.: A Nonparametric Statistical Comparison of Principal Component and Linear Discriminant Subspaces for Face Recognition, Proc. Of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, (2001) 535–542  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus  

[14] Martinez, A., Kak, A.: PCA versus LDA, IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Inteligence, 23(2), 2001 228–233  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus  

[15] Navarrete, P., Ruiz-del-Solar, J.: Analysis and Comparison of Eigenspace-Based Face Recognition Approaches, International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 16(7), 2002 817–830  
» CrossRef  » Google Scholar  » PubMed  » DOAJ  » CAS  » Scopus