THE VERTICAL DIFFERENTIATION MODEL IN THE INSURANCE MARKET

Mahito Okura1*
1Faculty of Economics, Nagasaki University, Japan
* Corresponding Author : okura@nagasaki-u.ac.jp

Received : -     Accepted : -     Published : 21-12-2010
Volume : 1     Issue : 2       Pages : 12 - 14
Int J Econ Bus Model 1.2 (2010):12-14
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0976-531X.1.2.12-14

Keywords : Vertical differentiation model, Quality, Insurance, Equilibrium, Duopoly
Conflict of Interest : None declared

Cite - MLA : Mahito Okura "THE VERTICAL DIFFERENTIATION MODEL IN THE INSURANCE MARKET ." International Journal of Economics and Business Modeling 1.2 (2010):12-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0976-531X.1.2.12-14

Cite - APA : Mahito Okura (2010). THE VERTICAL DIFFERENTIATION MODEL IN THE INSURANCE MARKET . International Journal of Economics and Business Modeling, 1 (2), 12-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0976-531X.1.2.12-14

Cite - Chicago : Mahito Okura "THE VERTICAL DIFFERENTIATION MODEL IN THE INSURANCE MARKET ." International Journal of Economics and Business Modeling 1, no. 2 (2010):12-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0976-531X.1.2.12-14

Copyright : © 2010, Mahito Okura, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

This article explores the vertical differentiation model in the insurance market. The main results are as follows. First, the equilibrium price differential is not a linear function of the highest quality valuation (accident probability) and the maximum and minimum quality differentials. Second, a high quality insurance firm does not always receive greater equilibrium expected profit, even if its average cost is the same as that of a low-quality insurance firm. Finally, a change in the highest quality valuation has an ambiguous effect on the equilibrium expected profit differential.

References

[1] Hofmann A. and Nell M. (2008) Working Papers on Risk and Insurance, Hamburg University  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[2] Mussa M. and Rosen S. (1978) Journal of Economic Theory, 18, 301–317  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[3] Okura M. (2005) Journal of Insurance and Risk Management, 3(6), 45-68  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[4] Okura M. (2010) Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, 4(2), Article 2  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[5] Schlesinger H. and Schulenburg, M.G.V.D. (1991) Journal of Risk and Insurance, 58, 109–119.  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[6] Schlesinger H. and Schulenburg, M.G.V.D. (1993) Journal of Risk and Insurance, 60, 591–615.  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[7] Shaked A. and Sutton J. (1982) Review of Economic Studies, 49, 3–13.  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[8] Shy O. (1995) Industrial Organization: Theory and Applications, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus  

[9] Tirole J. (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.  
» CrossRef   » Google Scholar   » PubMed   » DOAJ   » CAS   » Scopus