ISSN : 0975-3710
EISSN : 0975-9107
KANDIL A.A.1, SHARIEF A.E.2*, NASSAR E.S.E3
1Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Egypt.
2Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Egypt.
3Central Administration for Seed certification (CASC), Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt.
* Corresponding Author : sharief2005@yahoo.com
Received : 01-07-2012 Accepted : 18-07-2012 Published : 30-07-2012
Volume : 4 Issue : 6 Pages : 272 - 277
Int J Agr Sci 4.6 (2012):272-277
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0975-3710.4.6.272-277
Conflict of Interest : None declared
The purpose of this study was found out to investigate the response of some rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars to germination parameters under salinity stress. This study was carried out to confirm rice seedling growth performance and to examine a range of genetic variability for salinity tolerance among ten rice cultivars under seven salinity levels. A laboratory experiment was accompanied at Giza Central Seed Testing laboratory (CASC), Egypt. The results showed that rice cultivars significantly varied in means of Final Germination Percentage (FGP), Germination Rate (GR), Germination Index (GI), Vigor Index (VI), Root Length, Shoot Length, Root Fresh Weight, Shoot Fresh Weight, Root Dry Weight, Relative Dry Weight and Seedling Height Reduction. Sakha 102 and Sakha 106 had positive effects in most of studied characters while, Giza 181 cultivar had negative effects in most of germination parameters under study. Salinity levels significantly varied in all germination parameters under study except shoot dry weight character. Increasing salinity concentration from 0 to 14% NaCl gradually reduced averages of germination and seedling characters. All studied characters were significantly affected by the interaction between cultivars and salinity stress, vice versa, shoot, root fresh weight and root dry weight didn't affect by interaction. It could be established that for exploiting rice germination percentage and seedling parameters under salinity stress are recognized by using rice Sakha 102, Sakha 106, Sakha 104 and Egyptian Yasmin cultivars with increasing salinity levels up to 14% NaCl. These cultivars were more tolerant to salinity and suggested to use in breeding program for attractive rice production in Egypt.
Oryza sativa, salinity concentration, germination characters, rice cultivars, seedling parameters
Rice is considered as a major cereal crop for more than 50% of the world population. There is a great shortage in rice production more than 25% of the recent production may be needed [1] . Moreover, rice ranks second after wheat crop as the national income is concerned. The excessive increase in population in Egypt needs to increase the total yield of this crop in order to overcome this lack in production through its cultivation in the newly reclaimed lands especially under saline conditions of such soil. Rice is one of the most effective and commercial means of reclaiming hundreds of thousands of hectares of saline lands in Egypt. Growth characters including shoot height, fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area of salt-stressed seedlings were inhibited, depending on rice genotypes [2] . Rice varieties showed a great variation in germination due to salinity effects. Many investigators concluded that differences among rice cultivars in germination characters and seedling [3,15,17,22] .
Salinity is one of the major obstacles in enhancing rice production in growing areas in Egypt. Salinity decreases final germination percentage, speed of germination and led to reduction in shoot and root length and dry weight in all varieties and the magnitude of reduction increased with increasing salinity stress [11] . Therefore, development of salt tolerance varieties has been considered as one of strategies to increase rice production in saline prone areas or irrigation with mixed water at the end of water rivers. Salt stress decreased seed vigor of rice cultivars, LD a superior cultivar under all salt stress which can be suggested for cultivation under salinity condition was obtained. [12,14,17,20,22] .
It is very important to study the interaction effects of variability of sodium chloride effects within studied rice varieties [3,11,17] . The objectives of this research were aimed to study the performance of cultivars and salinity stress and their interactions on germination parameters of rice plants under laboratory conditions.
A laboratory experiment was conducted at Giza Central Seed Testing laboratory of Central Administration for Seed Testing and Certification (CASC), Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt during the period of December 2011 to January 2012 to study the response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars to germinate it under salinity stress and to confirm the seedling growth performance to examine a range of genetic variability for salinity tolerance among rice cultivars.
The experiment was arranged in factorial experiment in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with four replications. The experiment included 10 different rice cultivars which were gotten from Rice Research Institute at Sakha, ARC, MOA, Egypt. Studied rice cultivars were stored under normal conditions in paper bags include 5 cultivars belong to Japonica type and 5 cultivars belong to Indicia type as showed in [Table-1] . Seven different salinity concentrations (NaCl) i.e. 0, 4%, 6%, 8%, 10%, 12% and 14% NaCl were used. Seeds of cultivars were surface sterilized by immersion for 5 minutes in sodium hypochlorite solution, then repeatedly washed with deionized water. Fifty seeds of uniform size in each treatment for each cultivar were allowed to germinate on a filter paper in 9 cm diameter petredishes. Each filter paper was moistened with a water solution at seven different NaCl concentrations. Thus, the whole experiment comprised 280 Petri dishes arranged in factorial experiment Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). The Petri dishes were placed in a growth chamber for 14 days at 28 ± C0 for germination.
After 14 days ten seedlings were selected from each replicates and then seedlings were evaluated as follows:
• Final Germination Percentage (FGP): FGP was calculated according to the following equation [7,19] . [Equ-1]
• Germination Rate (GR): it was calculated according the following equation [6] . [Equ-2]
• Germination Index (GI): according to the following equation described by [16] . It was calculated according the following equation. [Equ-3]
• Vigor index (VI): it was calculated according to the following equation: [Equ-4]
• Root length (cm).
• Shoot length (cm).
• Root fresh weight (mg).
• Shoot fresh weight (mg).
• Root dry weight (mg).
• Shoot dry weight (mg).
• Relative dry weight (RDW): It was calculated according to the following equation described by [12] . [Equ-5]
• Seedling height reduction (SHR): It was calculated using the following equation described by [12] . [Equ-6]
All obtained data were statistically analyzed according to the technique of analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the split – plot design [9] . By using means of “MSTAT-C†computer software package. Least Significant Difference (LSD) method was used to test the differences between treatment means at 5% level of probability [21] .
Results in [Table-2] clearly showed that the ten tested cultivars of rice significantly varied for averages of root length (cm), shoot length (cm), root fresh weight (mg), shoot fresh weight (mg), root dry weight (mg), final germination percentage (FGP), germination rate (GR), germination index (GI), vigor index (VI), relative dry weight (RDW) and seedling height reduction (SHR). Sakha 102, Sakha106, Sakha104, Giza 178 and Egyptian Yasmin cultivars significantly exceeded the other studied rice cultivars in final germination percentage, without significant differences between them. It could be observed that both Sakha 102 and Sakha 106 cultivars more tolerant than other studied cultivars. In addition, Giza 178 and Egyptian Yasmin cvs moderate to salinity. The results clearly designated that Sakha 102, Sakha 104 and Giza 181 cultivars significantly surpassed the other studied cultivars in germination rate, without significant differences between them. Sakha102, Sakha 104, Giza 178 and Egyptian Yasmin cvs significantly surpassed other studied rice cultivars in germination index, without significant changes between them. Sakha 102, Sakha 104, Giza 178 and Egyptian Yasmin cvs was more tolerant to salinity up to 14% NaCl, while Sakha 105 was more sensitive to salinity.Sakha 106, Sakha 102 and Egyptian hybrid 1 CVs significantly surpassed the other studied cultivars in vigor index without significant differences between them. The differences between rice CVs in germination characters might be due to the genetical factors and heredity variation among the ten rice cvs under study which caused differed in germination characters. These results in good arrangement with those summarized that selected genotypes differently responded to salinity [7,12,18] .
Sakha106 CV significantly outdone the other studied cultivars in root length in view of the fact that produced the tallest root length. Root length of Sakha 106 exceeded by 97.3% compared with Egyptian Yasmin CV and by 90.6% compared with Egyptian hybrid 2 and by 87.5% compared with Giza 181 CV. Egyptian Hybrid 1, Sakha 102 and Egyptian hybrid 2 CV significantly exceeded the other studied cvs without significant differences between them. Egyptian hybrid 1 CV exceeded Sakha 104 CV by 26.0%, Sakha 105 CV by 25.6%, Egyptian Yasmin CV by 25.6, Giza 181 CV by 17.3%, Giza 182 CV by 20.1%, Giza 178 CV by 19.1% and Sakha 106 CV by 8.8% in shoot length. Giza 182 significantly surpassed other studied cultivars in root fresh weight followed by Egyptian Hybrid 1 and Egyptian Yasmin, respectively. Giza 182 CV surpassed Egyptian hybrid 2 CV by 81.25%, Sakha 105 CV by 79.16%, Giza 181 CV by 71.8%, Giza 178 CV by 62.5%, Sakha 102 CV by 59.37%, Sakha 104 CV by 47.91%, Sakha 106 CV by 45.83%, Egyptian Yasmin CV by 42.7% and Egyptian hybrid 1 CV by 32.29% in root fresh weight. Giza 178 cultivar significantly exceeded the other studied CVs in shoot fresh weight (mg) in view of the fact that produced the highest shoot fresh weight, followed with statistical significance by Sakha 102 and Sakha 106 CVs in the second and third ranks, respectively. It could be discerned that Giza 178 cv surpassed Giza 181 cv by 52.2%, Giza 182 cv by 30.9%, Egyptian hybrid 2 cv by 31.8%, Egyptian Yasmin cv by 30.0%, Sakha 105 cv by 25.6%, Sakha 104 cv by 20.3%, Egyptian hybrid 1 cv by 16.9% and Sakha 106 cv by 9.7% in shoot fresh weight. Egyptian Hybrid 1, Egyptian hybrid 2, Sakha 102, Giza 178, Giza 181 and Giza 182 CVs significantly outdone other studied CVs in root dry weight, without significant differences between them. While, Sakha 106 CV recorded the minimum weight of root dry weight, However, Sakha 102, Giza 181 and Giza 182 CVs recorded intermediate weights of root dry weight compared to the other studied CVs. Egyptian Hybrid 1, Egyptian Hybrid 2, Sakha 102 and Sakha 106 CVs significantly surpassed the other studied rice CVS in shoot dry weight without significant differences between them. Egyptian hybrid 1 and Giza 178 CVs significantly surpassed other studied cultivars in relative dry weight without significant differences between them. Sakha 102 and Sakha 105 CVs significantly exceeded other studied cvs in seedling height reduction percentage without significant differences between them. Followed by Sakha 104, Egyptian yasmin, Giza 181 and Giza 182 CVs, without significant differences between them. The differences between rice CVs in seedling parameters might be due to salt level side effects and to genetically factors and heredity variation among the ten studied CVs which differences in seedling parameters. Many similar deductions were reported with conclusion that salinity affect growth process and physiological consequences at advanced growth stages of genotypes [4,11,12,18] .
The results in [Table-3] indicated that salinity stress treatments had significant effects on means of root length (cm), shoot length (cm), root fresh weight (mg), shoot fresh weight (mg), root dry weight (mg), final germination percentage (FGP), germination rate (GR), germination index (GI), vigor index (VI) and relative dry weight (RDW). Highest means of these fonts were recorded with control treatment. Highest salinity focus up to 14% NaCl recorded the lowest averages of these characters. Increasing salinity concentrations from 0 to 14% NaCl gradually decreased averages of root length (cm), shoot length (cm), root fresh weight (mg), shoot fresh weight (mg) and root dry weight (mg). Highest final germination percentage (96.87%) was recorded with the control treatment compared with other salinity concentrations, followed by 95.62 and 95.37% with 4% and 6% Nacl without significant differences between them. Highest salinity concentration i.e. 14% NaCl recorded the lowest final germination percentage which was 82.87%. Germination percentage not affected from increasing salinity levels from 0% to 10% NaCl, however, increasing it to 12 and 14% NaCl significantly decreased final germination percentage. Highest number of germination rate was recorded with control treatment compared with other salinity concentrations. Highest salinity concentration i.e. 14% NaCl recorded the lowest germination rate. Highest germination index was obtained from the control treatment and salinity at concentration of 4% NaCl compared with other salinity stress concentrations without significant differences between them, which were 98.7 and 97.15% respectively. Highest of salinity concentrations at 14% NaCl recorded the lowest germination index. Highest vigor index values was recorded with the control treatment compared with other salinity stress concentrations (13.88%) followed by salinity concentration of 4 and 6% NaCl as an intermediate value of salinity concentrations. Highest salinity levels 14% NaCl chronicled the lowest vigor index value. High levels of salinity affected on germination characters might be due to toxic effects of salinity stress. Salinity decreased germination typescripts of seeds which are directly related to the amount of absorbed water by the seed. [5,8,12,13] . Seed germination was quantitative trait controlled by several gens and strongly affect by salt stress [22] .
Tallest root length was recorded with the control treatment compared with other salinity stress levels. Highest salinity level i.e. 14% NaCl reduced root length and recorded the lowest root length. The second salinity level i.e. 6% NaCl came in the second rank. It could be concluded that reducing salinity levels from 14%, 12%, 10%, 8%, 6% to 4% NaCl reduced root length by 71.7%, 61.5%, 42.6%, 28.0% 21.7% and 7.5% respectively compared with control treatment. Reducing salinity levels from 14%, 12%, 10%, 8%, 6% to 4% NaCl reduced shoot length by 65.7%, 51.88%, 41.17%, 27.6, 18.55% and 8.44%, respectively compared without salinity i.e. control treatment. Highest weight of root fresh was obtained with the control treatment compared with other salinity levels, followed by 4% NaCl and 6% NaCl as intermediate values. Highest salinity level i.e. 14% NaCl recorded the lowest root fresh weight. Reducing salinity levels from 14%, 12%, 10%, 8%, 6% to 4% NaCl reduced shoot fresh weight by 68.84%, 58.19%, 49.2%, 38.4%, 27.5, and 10.86% compared with the control treatment. Highest root dry weight was obtained from the control treatment compared with other salinity levels. Increasing salinity level to 4 and 6% NaCl came in the second and third rank after control. Highest salinity level 14% NaCl was recorded the lowest root dry weight. Highest shoot dry weight was obtained from the control treatment compared with other salinity levels, followed by 4 and 6% NaCl as intermediate values. Highest salinity level i.e. 14% NaCl recorded the lowest shoot dry weight. Highest relative dry weight was obtained from the control treatment compared with other salinity levels which was 100.0%, followed by salinity concentrations of 4 and 6% NaCl as an intermediate value of salinity levels. Highest salinity level of 14% NaCl recorded the lowest relative dry weight. Relative dry weight gradually decreased with increasing of salinity levels. Highest seedling height reduction was obtained from the salinity level of 14% NaCl treatment compared with other salinity concentrations, followed by salinity levels of 12 and 10% NaCl as an intermediate values of salinity levels. The control treatment recorded the lowest percentages of seedling height reduction value, followed by salinity level of 4 and 6% NaCl. The gradual decrease in seedling parameters with the increase in salinity as observed might be due to more inhibitory effect of NaCl salt to root growth compared to that of shoot growth and to sodium level in the shoots during early growth. In addition to the cellular toxicity of NaCl in rice seedlings and reduction of chlorophyll content under saline [5,8,10] . Salinity decreased final germination percentage, speed of germination, germination energy percentage and led to reduction in shoot and root length and dry weight in all studied varieties and the magnitude of reduction increased with increasing salinity stress [11] .
The interaction between rice cultivars and salinity levels significantly affected final germination percentage as shown in [Fig-1] . Highest final germination percentage was produced from Sakha 102 and Sakha 106 cultivars with snowballing salinity levels up to 10% NaCl. Whereas, the lowest final germination percentages were resulted from sowing Sakha 105 and Egyptian Hybrid 2 cultivars at higher salinity levels of 14% NaCl without significant differences between them. Highest averages of germination rate were resulted from sowing Sakha 106, Sakha 104 and Egyptian Yasmin cvs and increasing salinity concentrations up to 10% NaCl without significant differences between them as shown in [Fig-2] . The lowest average of germination rate was resulted from sowing Sakha 105 and Egyptian hybrid 2 cultivars at higher salinity level of 14% NaCl without significant differences between them. Uppermost germination index was recorded with Sakha 102 and Sakha 106 cultivars with increasing salinity level up to 10% NaCl without significant differences between them as shown in [Fig-3] . On contrary, the lowest value of germination index was resulted from sowing Sakha 105 with higher salinity level of 14% NaCl. In addition, uppermost vigor index percentages were resulted from sowing Sakha 102 CV and the control treatment as shown in [Fig-4] . On conflicting, the lowest percentage of vigor index was resulted from Sakha 104 or Giza 181 cultivar with highest salinity levels of 14% NaCl. Tallest root length was chronicled with Sakha 106 cultivar and the control treatment as shown in [Fig-5] . Whilst, the shortest in root length were caused from sowing Sakha 104 or Giza 181 with high salinity concentration i.e.14% NaCl. Moreover, tallest shoot length was obtained from all studied cultivars at control treatment. Sakha 102 and Egyptian hybrid 1 at control treatment twisted tallest shoot length as shown in [Fig-6] . The shortest shoot length was obtained from Giza 181, Sakha 105 and Sakha 104 cvs without significant differences between them. Highest shoot dry weight was resulted from sowing Egyptian Hybrid 1, Sakha 102, Sakha 104, Sakha 106 and Egyptian Yasmin cvs and control treatment without significant differences between them as shown in [Fig-7] The lowest shoot dry weight was resulted from sowing Giza 181, Giza 182 and Sakha 104 cvs and salinity concentration of 14% NaCl without significant differences between them. Highest relative dry weight percentages were resulted from sowing all studied cvs with control treatment as shown in [Fig-8] . Snowballing salinity levels from 4% NaCl to 14% NaCl significantly reduced relative dry weight in all studied cvs. The lowest percentage of relative dry weight was resulted from sowing Giza 181, Giza 182 and Sakha 104 cvs with highest salinity levels of 14% NaCl. Highest percentages of seedling height reduction was occasioned from sowing Giza181 cultivar with salinity level of 14% NaCl treatment, followed by Sakha 102, Sakha 104 and Sakha 105 with salinity level of 14% NaCl without significant differences between them as shown in [Fig-9] . The lowest percentages of seedling height reduction were resulted from sowing all studied cvs with control treatment. Differences between cultivars tolerance to salinity may be due to higher proline, protein and starch content under salt stress [3] . Salt stress decreased vigor of all studied rice cultivars [17] .
It could be concluded that for maximizing rice germination percentage and seedling parameters under salinity stress are producing by using rice Sakha 102, Sakha 106, Sakha 104 and Egyptian Yasmin cultivars under salinity levels level up to 14% NaCl. These cultivars were more tolerant to salinity and recommended to use them in breeding program for enhancing rice production in Egypt.
• FGP: Final Germination Percentage
• GR: Germination Rate
• GI: Germination Index
• VI: Vigor Index
• RL: Root Length
• SL: Shoot Length
• RFW: Root Fresh Weight
• SFW: Shoot Fresh Weight
• RDW: Root Dry Weight
• SDW: Shoot Dry Weight
• SHR: Seedling Height Reduction
[1] Bhuiyan N.I., Paul D.N.R. and Jabber M.A. (2002) National Workshop on Rice Research and Extension.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[2] Cha-um S., Trakulyingcharoen T., Smitamana P. and Kirdmanee C. (2009) Aust. J. Crop Sci., 3(4), 221-230.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[3] Danai-Tambhale S., Kumar V. and Shriram V. (2011) J. Stress Physiol. Biochem., 7, 387-397.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[4] Djanaguiraman M., Senthil A. and Ramadass R. (2003a) Madras Agric. J., 90(7-9), 506-510.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[5] Djanaguiraman M., Ramadass R. and Devi D.D. (2003b) Madras Agric. J., 90 (1-3), 50-53.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[6] Ellis R.H. and Roberts E.H. (1980) Towards a Rational Basis for Testing Seed Quality, 605-635.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[7] Ellis R.H. and Roberts E.H. (1981) Seed Sci. Technol., 9, 373-409.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[8] Golshani M., Pirdashti H., Saeb K., Babakhani B. and Heidarzade A. (2010) World Applied Sci. J., 9 (2), 221-225.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[9] Gomez K.A. and Gomez A.A. (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edition, 680.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[10] Habib N., Muhammad A. and Ahmad M.S.A. (2010) Pak. J. Bot., 42(6), 4071-4078.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[11] Hakim M.A., Juraimi A.S., Begum M., Hanafi M.M., Ismail M.R. and Selamat A. (2010) Afric. J. Biotech., 9(13), 1911-1918.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[12] Islam M.M. and Karim M.A. (2010) The Agricult., 8(2), 57-65.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[13] Jamil M. and Rha E.S. (2007) Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 10, 4303-4306.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[14] Joseph B. and Jini D. (2010) Int. J. Bot., 10, 456-464.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[15] Joseph B., Jini D. and Sujatha S. (2010) Asian J. of Agric. Sci., 2(3), 99-105.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[16] Karim M.A., Utsunomiya N. and Shigenaga S. (1992) J. Crop Sci. 61, 279- 284.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[17] Kazemi K. and Eskandari H. (2011) African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(77), 17789-17792.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[18] Rahman M.S., Miyake H. and Takeoka Y. (2001) Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 4(3), 351-355.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[19] Ruan S., Xue Q. and Thlkowska K. (2002) Seed Sci. Technol. 30, 451-458.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[20] Saeidzadeh F., Gurbanov E. and Dunyamaliyev S.A. (2011) Son Yenilenme Pazar Ertesi., 4, 23-32.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[21] Snedecor G.W. and Cochran W.G. (1980) Statistical Methods" 7th Ed., 507.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
[22] Zhoufei W., Jianfei W., Yunyu B. and Hongsheng Z. (2011) Euphytica., 178(3), 297-307.
» CrossRef » Google Scholar » PubMed » DOAJ » CAS » Scopus
 | Fig. 1- Averages final germination percentage (%) as affected by the interaction between cultivars and salinity stress (NaCl %). |
 | Fig. 2- Averages germination rate as affected by the interaction between cultivars and salinity stress (NaCl %). |
 | Fig. 3- Averages germination index % as affected by the interaction between cultivars and salinity stress (NaCl %). |
 | Fig. 4- Averages vigor index % as affected by the interaction between cultivars and salinity stress (NaCl %). |
 | Fig.5- Averages root length cm as affected by the interaction between cultivars and salinity stress (NaCl %). |
 | Fig. 6- Averages shoot length cm as affected by the interaction between cultivars and salinity stress (NaCl %). |
 | Fig. 7- Averages shoot dry weight mg as affected by the interaction between cultivars and salinity stress (NaCl %). |
 | Fig.8- Averages relative dry weight % as affected by the interaction between cultivars and salinity stress (NaCl %). |
 | Fig. 9- Percentages seedling height reduction % as affected by the interaction between cultivars and salinity stress (NaCl %). |
 | Table 1- Name, type, pedigree and year of release of studied cultivars |
 | Table 2- Averages of final germination percentage (%), germination rate, germination index, vigor index, root length, shoot length, root fresh weight, shoot fresh weight, root dry weight, shoot dry weight, relative dry weight and seedling height reduction as affected by rice studied cultivars. *, ** and NS indicate P< 0.05, P< 0.01 and not significant, respectively |
 | Table 3- Averages of final germination percentage (%), germination rate, germination index, vigor index, root length, shoot length, root fresh weight, shoot fresh weight, root dry weight, shoot dry weight, relative dry weight and seedling height reduction as affected by salinity concentrations (NaCl). *, ** and NS indicate P< 0.05, P< 0.01 and not significant, respectively |
 | Equ. 1- |
 | Equ. 2- |
 | Equ. 3- |
 | Equ. 4- |
 | Equ. 5- |
 | Equ. 6- |